WCW Rules' Review of comicgeekelly's POI 31
I'm back, kiddo! I apologize for missing some of your other shows; I was kinda busy. Let's see how well you've done for yourself, shall we?
Okay match, bad execution. Again, you miss opportunities, and unfortunately, your writing kinda makes the match unreadable during certain points. You do not use antecedents, meaning he and his, and there's barely any transitioning. As far as content goes, 'tis okay, but it's your standard, run of the mill Raven match. Even though it's as a result of interference from Edge, I'm glad Albright picked up the win. Again, your promos are just.... "I want you in a match, come on, do you accept?" They're so monotone and prosaic, there's no depth or substance, and they're incredibly short. I know I may sound like a broken record, but if you want to get better, you must improve. In my opinion, you're still back where you started.
Very short promo from Nigel; he sounded kinda generic, though I guess this was needed. TBH, your second match was pretty bad. Daniels, and dare I say, even Kennedy can do better. You're placing these guys in meaningless gimmick matches, and I'm not sure if they serve a higher purpose. Did Daniels win? You didn't clarify.
Solid match, though nothing too special. The finish could've been done more efficiently. Again though, in order for your matches to be more effective and enjoyable to read, you need to utilize antecedents and clear transitioning. No more comments on this, I believe you know enough already. This in-ring segment again missed some opportunities, and honestly, I found myself kinda hoping for more; you can really capitalize on your talent, but you don't seem to. A short promo by Age of the Fall and MCMG, and again, all about championships and so forth. When are we going to see something a little more personal, more meaningful than the tired and true allure of gold? Men surely aren't this shallow.
Some grammatical errors and transitional mishaps hindered what could've potentially been MOTN. The content was there, but the means to execute it in a coherent manner were absent. I'm surprised Strong jobbed, but AJ is the bigger star.
I'm guessing another Gimmick match? Been watching TNA, have you? Okay, for one, blood in the beginning, and from a ostensibly mild headbutt? A little unrealistic, and believe me when I say, I don't particularly care for realism too much. I'm not an afficianado for hardcore kind of matches, so marks are going down as I see weapons being periodically used without much purpose or build up. They're just being used for the hell of it, and it's something I see in all your shows. I liked Nigel falling through the table, though. I honestly didn't see Nigel picking up the win, but it gives him a hell of a lot of momentum, that's for sure.
Overall, mediocre show. Your dependance on gimmick matches and weaponry damages some potentially great matches. I'd LOVE your matches if you'd improve your writing and build them up in-ring, having them serve some purpose. MOTN, probably your ME. There's quite a bit of missed opportunities in every match you write, as they can be something more. Your promos lack substance and effective execution. You need to work on description, grammar, and probably more importantly, the purpose your matches serve. They can be sick, but there are certain things holding them back.