WWE vs TNA: Which is better?

[JC Punk]

WWE by a mile way better talent and better shows hands down WWE

 

[n00b]

tna cuz they got hotter women

 

[OsamaHussian]

^ End of Story..

 

[Bigfella]

WWE Have John Cena.

TNA > WWE

 

[the dark knight]

WWE Have John Cena.

TNA > WWE

so totally the other way around. cena's autograph signing can get more ratings than impact...

 

[The Mac]

Any normal wrestling fan will say WWE, only a total TNA mark who is too blind to actually see what is going on will say TNA.

WWE FOREVER!

 

[rosewt01]

WWE Rule.
TNA Suck.
WWE Forever
TNA Never

 

[WFS2008]

TNA only because when watching Raw lately it feels like im watching a comedy show and not wrestling because theres hardly any worthwhile matches. That being said TNA does have a lot of humor as well but right now I think the wrestling on their tapings is better. I still stand by the opinion that WWE is in a slump right now but I know they will get out of it because overall they are the best.

 

[OsamaHussian]

so totally the other way around. cena's autograph signing can get more ratings than impact...

HAHAHAHA!! The sad thing is, that's probably right...

 

[King Of Kings]

Its not even a debate TNAs rateings are the same as ECWs rateings.

 

[Qwake]

WWE is better, but if TNA changed a couple of things they would have a chance to be better

 

[theovertaker]

WWE is the best purely because it can afford to be TNA can only get second rate superstars or washed up wwe superstars ( sting ) or people who have fallen out with wwe ( rhino ) until that changes wwe will be the best :hoover:

 

[KroniK 4-2-0]

^^Ur an idiot.

Sting, washed up WWE Superstar?

Sting wrestled for WCW, NWA, ect. NOT WWE (From what I know)

Booker T, Christian, Angle washed up?

You're an idiot, son. Dont judge people from only three years of watching WWE. Learn your history, son.

 

[Kaedon]

^^Ur an idiot.

Sting, washed up WWE Superstar?

Sting wrestled for WCW, NWA, ect. NOT WWE (From what I know)

Booker T, Christian, Angle washed up?

You're an idiot, son. Dont judge people from only three years of watching WWE. Learn your history, son.

No, but Tomko, Kevin Nash, and Scott Steiner are all WWE rejects and/or washed up. TNA takes WWE's sloppy seconds.

 

[John]

now then if we figure this out then we come to a reasonable conclusion. WWE have three brands so naturally people think there better because they have more talent. but actually what WWE have is loads of talent trying to be better than one another. and yes some wwe hasbeens are going to TNA, but TNA is the future of the business by hosting talent like Jay Lethal, Petey Williams, AJ Styles, Chris Daniels and more uncoming stars. wwe hosts to upcoming stars like Batista, Orton, Cena and to a certain extent HHH. wwe have a certain amount of old stars like Mick Foley, Stone Cold who make guests appearances and the crowd goes wild but TNA hosts great athletic matches like Ultimate X. then we come to the gimmick matches, TNA have the beer drinking contest. WWE have the divas matches. and thats a new topic entirely WWE divas. wwe have slutty women wear little clothes parade around the ring whereas TNA have good knockouts who actually compete inside the ring instead of outside the ring on a weekly basis. then the announcers. Yet again WWE host to old school types of commentators whereas tna have annoying announcers.

My Verdict: WWE are better than TNA at the moment.