Ratings say WWE.
I say...i have no clue, but i guess a slight edge goes to WWE because i grow up with it.
I say...i have no clue, but i guess a slight edge goes to WWE because i grow up with it.
I like oranges...let me tell you why i like oranges better than apples. Oranges have a direct flavor that is juicy and refreshing. When i bite into a apple, its kinda hard and mushy. Plus you can hurt your teeth biting into an apple.
Alright, this is Trav's logic right here.
He said yesterday that WWE is better than ROH, but ROH used to be better. Then today he said that WWE is better than ROH, because ROH isn't a threat to WWE. ROH were never a threat clearly. So how in the hell does that make any sense?
Go out in the street and ask someone who Nigel is, I guarantee you nobody will know, or at the least very little. If Nigel debut in TNA today he would be regarded as a rookie, because only hardcore fans know about him. You say ROH made Joe which is wrong, TNA made Joe. They are the ones who made him popular, and made him known to all types of fans, not only the hardcore ones. If you are correct, you could say the same shit about everyone in OVW. Hey, Punk main evented OVW and ROH, so those companies made him, not WWE. Same with Prototype, or John Cena, and Batista. They were made by OVW because they main evented there...
Samoa Joe was made by TNA, same with AJ Styles. Deal with it, its the truth
I said that ROH's wrestling is better than WWE's wrestling, but ROH will never be a serious contender to WWE in ratings or PPV Buys
Samoa Joe and AJ Styles were made by ROH...
Maybe if it didn't take you until now to admit you contradicted yourself, I wouldn't have to repeat myself, would I?Travis40 said:I don't want to admit because I'm fucking right. And talking to BKB is like talking to a fucking child...he goes back on one thing that I contradicted myself on and he fucking just keeps saying it about 400 fucking times. I admit I contradicted myself...god damn