They have also found a blood spattered bat and her skull was crushed.
The whole intruder story is such bullshit and the stupid ex-girlfriend trying to back it all up with HE WAS NEVER VIOLENT TOWARDS ME, EVER, as if that means he would never snap one day and kill anyone.
Beats her with a bat, shoots her multiple times, and it was 'self defence'? Ehhh, no. If the lights were off, he obviously seen enough to know where the person was (let alone would have been able to make out a slender female silhouette). He either beat her in head in with the bat and then shot her, or shot her and then beat her with the bat, which means that entire time, he didn't know who it was? If he shot her and she went down, why beat her skull in unless he wanted the person to die? If he hit her with the bat first, I am sure she would have screamed or made some sort of noise for him to know who it was, and, if she were knocked out from the blow, you're going to tell me he didn't notice who it was, grabbed his gun and shot her while she lay blacked out on the floor?
His story makes 0 fucking sense. I get that it was late at night but I find it hard to believe that he didn't at some point see who it was.
I don't know if the lived together, but, if they did, and she was just coming home from somewhere, I find it hard to believe she didn't walk in and turn on the lights as she took off her shoes and such. If he heard someone walking in the hall, how would he not hear the door open, keys getting set on a table/jangling, high heels, etc.?
If they didn't live together then he had to have invited her over.
EDIT: It was actually a blood splattered cricket.