Call it bitching & complaining

[xtremebadass]

Wow, thought you were a little smarter then this. A mod that moderates HIAT does nothing at all, the section has no rules whatsoever, therefore they have nothing to moderate because anything anybody does is alright in that section. You understand? You guys put Beer incharge of that section, you told Beer to do whatever he wants pretty much, and that's what he did, he banned people that were annoying and ruining threads with lame jokes and whatnot, its not like he banned them from the forum, he was just giving them a short ban from HIAT.

We discussed with Beer what he was allowed to do when he became Mod. Banning people was never brought up in the discussion. We probably should have emphasized it more not to ban people from HIAT but atleast I didn't think he would be that stupid to ban someone from HIAT.

Man seriously, I don't know how you're on staff when you're giving back replies like that.

...but a staff member does more than just ban. What exactly was wrong with what I said?

 

[Mike Chaos]

My take on Beer being HIAT mod:
Beer was made HIAT mod to filter out people who are not funny even though they are trying to be. And to ban people who can't handle HIAT. He can also ban people at his own discretion as well in hope that it stirs the pot of controversy. It is HIAT, a section basically for fun.

 

[Qwake]

We discussed with Beer what he was allowed to do when he became Mod. Banning people was never brought up in the discussion. We probably should have emphasized it more not to ban people from HIAT but atleast I didn't think he would be that stupid to ban someone from HIAT.



...but a staff member does more than just ban. What exactly was wrong with what I said?

Yes a staff member does more then just ban, the only staff member that doesn't is if you're the mod of the HIAT section, what more could a mod of the HIAT section do besides ban? He can't instruct the rules because there are no rules. The statement was Blue.

 

[xtremebadass]

Yes a staff member does more then just ban, the only staff member that doesn't is if you're the mod of the HIAT section, what more could a mod of the HIAT section do besides ban? He can't instruct the rules because there are no rules. The statement was Blue.

What part of "We discussed Beer's duties" don't you understand?

Quoted from Mike Chaos

Beer was made HIAT mod to filter out people who are not funny even though they are trying to be.

I assumed that didn't mean banning people, but w/e.

 

[the408kid]

My take on Beer being HIAT mod:
Beer was made HIAT mod to filter out people who are not funny even though they are trying to be. And to ban people who can't handle HIAT. He can also ban people at his own discretion as well in hope that it stirs the pot of controversy. It is HIAT, a section basically for fun.

Alright Mike fair enough, but I refuse to kiss his but to get back in. No way aint gonna happen.

 

[Qwake]

At XBA: Did you care to read the rest of Mike Chaos' post?

And to ban people who can't handle HIAT. He can also ban people at his own discretion as well in hope that it stirs the pot of controversy. It is HIAT, a section basically for fun.

Did you assume that didn't mean banning people too?

I'm guessing you didn't discuss Beer's duties because they're pretty much what Mike Chaos just posted and you don't seem to know what they are.

 

[Hometown Kid]

My take on Beer being HIAT mod:
Beer was made HIAT mod to filter out people who are not funny even though they are trying to be. And to ban people who can't handle HIAT. He can also ban people at his own discretion as well in hope that it stirs the pot of controversy. It is HIAT, a section basically for fun.

So you're basically admitting you did something stupid for the sole purpose of starting trouble?

Nice job, boys.

Not to mention something you seemingly overlooked for some reason, and that's humor is different to everyone and is not to be judged. Not everyone thinks Beer is a proper judge of those things, just like they wouldn't if I was in his shoes or anyone else. The point of foruming is to interact with people. Not everyone is going to enjoy everyone else's company, but enemies and proper rivals are part of the fun I think. But of course here some take it too far and use "serious business" as a copout, so i'm not really surprised at any of this.

 

[LadyHotrod]

Funny part about this whole thing? I admitted I was wrong before I said anything. Got any thing else you would like to misrepresent?

I thought you had common sense? You preach the shit out of it yet you still made the thread.


Practice what you preach, brotha.

<3

 

[Kizza]

All members have the right to post in each section while obeying the rules. If they do not break the rules they should not be banned. It is that plain and simple. They cannot be banned because one staff member finds them annoying or they just do not like them. That is ludicrous.

G1 thinks Diesel getting banned for absolutely nothing is fine. Yet members who post child pornography of a member getting sucked off by their own child does not get punished one bit. I am sorry but logic needs to step into a situation like this even if it is HIAT. Use your head and think about this for a second.

Well then do your fucking job and ban them.

 

[Beer]

I assumed that didn't mean banning people, but w/e.

lololololol. What other way am I gonna do it? Flame them to eternal death?

 

[Quintastic One]

Shit happens in HIAT. Beer is good at stirring that shit when it happens, so that it's nice and frothy.


My point is, shit is going to go down in HIAT whether you think it's fair or not. People get flamed, peoples kids and family are gonna have pictures of dicks ejaculating on them. You ask for an opinion? You get porn. You have an issue? Shit gets settled there. You want to say the word shit enough times that it would and should get you an infraction if used excessively to shit in a section that kinda shit is not tolerated in? Then you go to HIAT for that shit.

On that note, Knox Beard is still the shit and needs some Mod lovin'.

 

[JurassicBonez]

Hiat thread is a joke, it should be treated as such. You make someone boss of something that's a joke and expect him to be serious? Really?

 

[xtremebadass]

I'm guessing you didn't discuss Beer's duties because they're pretty much what Mike Chaos just posted and you don't seem to know what they are.

To my knowledge, Beer was allowed to edit and delete posts. Banning was never brought up in the discussion.

 

[Qwake]

What happened to "What part of "We discussed Beer's duties" don't you understand?". You clearly didn't discuss shit with them because you didn't even know about what Mike listed above, you don't even know what you're talking about tbh. If banning wasn't brought up in the discussion then why did Mike just say all that stuff about banning in his above post?

Also, way to skip half of my post and like three others members posts, what's the matter, can't answer them?

 

[xtremebadass]

What happened to "What part of "We discussed Beer's duties" don't you understand?". You clearly didn't discuss shit with them because you didn't even know about what Mike listed above, you don't even know what you're talking about tbh. If banning wasn't brought up in the discussion then why did Mike just say all that stuff about banning in his above post?

Listen, I am looking at the thread about how much power Beer can have and the word ban or the possibility of Beer banning anyone was never brought up in the thread. What can I tell you? Maybe he PM'd Beer or something along those lines. From the public staff discussion about Beer's powers as a Mod, for the last time, banning people was never discussed. I can't tell you to go look for yourself because you aren't staff, so you probably won't believe me anyways just from your tone of your posts.

Also, way to skip half of my post and like three others members posts, what's the matter, can't answer them?

You mean about members getting silent banned? All I could say is that it was a unanimous staff decision at the time. It wasn't solely my decision. You are asking the wrong person about that.