Worst Wrestlemania line-up ever?

[Redboy123@]

Yes, they over-did it with the 6 F5s.

There are too many little guys these days. And the vast majority of them only appeal to a niche audience. Styles, Bryan and Balor are not headline material. Well, maybe Styles at a stretch. But he's not "face of the company" material.

Not that many big guys out there anymore tbh. They have Strowman and Lashley who are getting pushed. I suppose they have Sullivan. A lot of big guys are fucking shit tho. Big Cass was donkey wank lol

 

[Jacob Fox]

Wrestlemania 9 had Hogan and Bret.

Even in 1993, Hogan was a bigger and better name than those on this card.

So? This thread claims it is the worst lineup ever. That means you have to take the entire lineup into account. Yeah, 9 might have had Hogan and Bret but it also had Doink the Clown, Lex Luger pretending he was a character in Greek mythology, Crush, who was awful, the Giant Gonzales, Tatanka and Brutus Beefcake.

Hogan was on the card, but his match was teaming with Brutus Beefcake to take on Money Inc. So being on the card is irrelevant because they put him in a stupid match. And Bret Hart was wrestling a man who was 550 lbs. I like Yokozuna, actually, but the vast majority of Bret Hart's moves couldn't work on him. So Bret Hart's entire offense in the match was punching.

We will have to wait until the card for this lineup is finished and then compare it to be fair. Having Hulk Hogan in a tag team match and Bret Hart wrestling a 550 LB man that he cannot use any of his wrestling moves until he applied the absolute worst Sharpshooter in wrestling history on Yoko..

Yeah, I think I am sticking with 9.

I am actually being ironic to a degree because I actually love Wrestlemania 9. That's because at the time,that was the first year I began buying pay per view. So that was the first Mania I ever bought and i illegally recorded it with my VCR and watched it like 1000 times. But the fact remains it was an awful card.

 

[TheWolf]

So? This thread claims it is the worst lineup ever. That means you have to take the entire lineup into account. Yeah, 9 might have had Hogan and Bret but it also had Doink the Clown, Lex Luger pretending he was a character in Greek mythology, Crush, who was awful, the Giant Gonzales, Tatanka and Brutus Beefcake.

Hogan was on the card, but his match was teaming with Brutus Beefcake to take on Money Inc. So being on the card is irrelevant because they put him in a stupid match. And Bret Hart was wrestling a man who was 550 lbs. I like Yokozuna, actually, but the vast majority of Bret Hart's moves couldn't work on him. So Bret Hart's entire offense in the match was punching.

We will have to wait until the card for this lineup is finished and then compare it to be fair. Having Hulk Hogan in a tag team match and Bret Hart wrestling a 550 LB man that he cannot use any of his wrestling moves until he applied the absolute worst Sharpshooter in wrestling history on Yoko..

Yeah, I think I am sticking with 9.

I am actually being ironic to a degree because I actually love Wrestlemania 9. That's because at the time,that was the first year I began buying pay per view. So that was the first Mania I ever bought and i illegally recorded it with my VCR and watched it like 1000 times. But the fact remains it was an awful card.

Well then, Lesnar being on the card is irrelevant because he's in a stupid match with Rollins. For star power, this year's Mania has the potential to be the worst. Or at close to it.

I am not a massive Bret Hart fan. But he's a better worker and a bigger name than any of today's full-timers. Even in 1993. He was certainly more worthy of a headline spot than Rollins, Bryan and Balor. Probably more than Lynch as well.

 

[Jacob Fox]

Well then, Lesnar being on the card is irrelevant because he's in a stupid match with Rollins. For star power, this year's Mania has the potential to be the worst. Or at close to it.

I am not a massive Bret Hart fan. But he's a better worker and a bigger name than any of today's full-timers. Even in 1993. He was certainly more worthy of a headline spot than Rollins, Bryan and Balor. Probably more than Lynch as well.

Everything you’re claiming is conjecture. And WWF lost money every year that Bret Hart was champion. Then, WWE lost Hart to WCW and shortly afterward, WCW began losing the Monday Night War. I AM a massive Bret Hart fan but he was never a big enough draw for any company as their top guy.

And no, your claim that due to my reasoning about bad match ups means Lesnar vs Rollins is irrelevant lacks any logic. In fact, it comes directly from your argument, which is flawed.I was naming matchups that had silly characters or bad draws . Lesnar and Rollins are two of the top draws in the business. Nothing in my post could lead you to that conclusion. You made a non sequitor.

 

[Redboy123@]

Seth vs Brock just has the best story. No other match up could rival it. Brock v Lashley... No. Brock vs Braun... Hell no. Wwe have a really good story on there hands here. Why the fuck would they waste it?

 

[TheWolf]

Everything you’re claiming is conjecture. And WWF lost money every year that Bret Hart was champion. Then, WWE lost Hart to WCW and shortly afterward, WCW began losing the Monday Night War. I AM a massive Bret Hart fan but he was never a big enough draw for any company as their top guy.

And no, your claim that due to my reasoning about bad match ups means Lesnar vs Rollins is irrelevant lacks any logic. In fact, it comes directly from your argument, which is flawed.I was naming matchups that had silly characters or bad draws . Lesnar and Rollins are two of the top draws in the business. Nothing in my post could lead you to that conclusion. You made a non sequitor.

Prove that Rollins is a draw.

 

[Unbesiegbar]

Tony Atlas said women are more popular because they have more psychology and I never thought about it but it's 100% right. Imo Tommasso Ciampa should be on the main roster he's made NXT can't miss for me

 

[Rosie]

"This guy is not a draw"

 

[Jay-Ashley]

"This guy is not a draw"

He isn't Kevin Nash or any other guys like Hogan or Austin or Rock. He only appeals to Neckbreads, Incels, Virgins, and Losers and Beta men.

 

[Rosie]

He isn't Kevin Nash or any other guys like Hogan or Austin or Rock

Yeah, he's just a Grand Slam Champion in WWE, beat Triple H at a Wrestlemania, and cheered more than the majority of the company. The fucking guy is not over at all with anyone and doesn't have the potential to be a draw of any sort.~

 

[Jay-Ashley]

Yeah, he's just a Grand Slam Champion in WWE, beat Triple H at a Wrestlemania, and cheered more than the majority of the company. The fucking guy is not over at all with anyone and doesn't have the potential to be a draw of any sort.~

Now you are getting. He only became a Grand Slam Champion to appeal to those Smarky Indy Incels Neckbread Losers, who are Soy Boys. He will never be on the level like Nash, Hall, Hogan, Austin, Rock, Cena, and so forth.

 

[Unbesiegbar]

He isn't Kevin Nash or any other guys like Hogan or Austin or Rock. He only appeals to Neckbreads, Incels, Virgins, and Losers and Beta men.

I might agree if Kevin Nash didn't start off the sentence the dude was the lowest drawing champion in WWE besides Brock Lesnar in 2018. And he was the domino effect in WCW's death

 

[Jay-Ashley]

I might agree if Kevin Nash didn't start off the sentence the dude was the lowest drawing champion in WWE besides Brock Lesnar in 2018. And he was the domino effect in WCW's death

Okay, it just a meme.

 

[Rosie]

I might agree if Kevin Nash didn't start off the sentence the dude was the lowest drawing champion in WWE besides Brock Lesnar in 2018. And he was the domino effect in WCW's death

 

[Unbesiegbar]

That was a joke? : most jokes start with knock knock or what do you get when:dale: