Awesome rebuttal. I like how you just didn't repeat the same vacuous and asinine opinions over again... oh wait.
Who should just retire?
- Thread starter 21403
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Undertaker is holding no one back. He is not a booker, he doesn't write the shows & he only has a say in his storylines, he doesn't do the old school HBK thing of holding down everyone but himself. Blame the people who decide on everything, namely anyone backstage named McMahon, for not pushing younger talent on Smackdown. You are wrong about John Cena, wrestling fans & people with kids who watch it know who he is, everyone else doesn't know him. Don't bring his movies into it, they were complete failures, they did nothing for his career but show that he is a pathetic actor. The movies were made to get Cena's foot in the door in Hollywood and garner interest from major studios, it didn't happen & he has only made WWE produced movies because his acting really really sucks. Undertaker is a household name, he has been around long enough that he is in the public consciousness & in his only acting role he played a mute ("Suburban Commando", playing the bad guy against Hulk Hogan's good guy).
Sorry for double post.
Undertaker does have a really big pull backstage. Im sure he does have some say in his booking right now in his career.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Mark Calaway knows what's better for his health, his finances, and his family a lot more than you do.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 6,454
- Reaction score
- 3,101
- Points
- 118
- Location
- Raccoon City
- Favorite Sports Team
-
After reading McFly's comments in this thread I now understand everyone's frustration with him.
Point is Undertaker is a valuable asset to the company. Just like Shawn Michaels was. He is given time off because he has deserved it and because he has given so much of his body to the company. Instead of flat out retiring and not helping the young guys, he stays around and then takes a break. He is a locker room leader and everyone looks up to him. Taker is key in the development of new stars. The wins and losses do not matter. When he is wrestling a young star they are learning from him. I think every boss would want a worker, not only in wrestling, like Taker (due to his commitment and loyalty) in their company as long as they can do the job successfully. To debate and try to make a case out of someone's career or drive to make money is stupid.
Point is Undertaker is a valuable asset to the company. Just like Shawn Michaels was. He is given time off because he has deserved it and because he has given so much of his body to the company. Instead of flat out retiring and not helping the young guys, he stays around and then takes a break. He is a locker room leader and everyone looks up to him. Taker is key in the development of new stars. The wins and losses do not matter. When he is wrestling a young star they are learning from him. I think every boss would want a worker, not only in wrestling, like Taker (due to his commitment and loyalty) in their company as long as they can do the job successfully. To debate and try to make a case out of someone's career or drive to make money is stupid.
Ahem:
Saying what a person needs to do and what they should do, and then stating that it's for their own good, really sounds to me like you'r implying you know better than that person does.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2008
- Messages
- 6,454
- Reaction score
- 3,101
- Points
- 118
- Location
- Raccoon City
- Favorite Sports Team
-