- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,302
- Reaction score
- 775
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 45
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
Huh? Isn't the audience that paid for the show supposed to enjoy it? I guess I must be missing your point here, but I think TNA should be very pleased that they got the kind of reactions they did last night. Like it or not, that crowd was fitting for their 10 year show and put pretty much every TNA crowd in the past couple of years to shame.I'm not sure when people starting giving two fucks whether or not people in the audience were having a good time but that doesn't make or break what I think of the show.
You conveniently left out Aries/Joe and the Tag Match, which were the best matches of the night.#HEEL said:I certainly don't want to see either Ray/Park or Kash/Hernandez again. But I'd see Storm/Roode again in a heart beat.
Sting and Roode had a history way before he came back...it goes all the way back to Victory Road and Roode humiliating him after he knocked himself out on the chair. Admittedly I didn't really want to see Sting/Roode again, but there was a precedent for it. I said Ray/Park was a "defacto" main event given its position on the card. It also happened to be a wildly entertaining match that far exceeded my expectations, but that's probably just me having a difference of opinion than you. As for Joe/Aries, I said it wasn't built properly, but it was still a hell of a match, and sometimes that's all that matters.#HEEL said:I'm sorry but I don't count waiting until there's only two weeks left, having Sting magically return and making Roode submit as a story worthy of TNA10. And we're counting Ray/Park as a main event? And what was the story behind Joe/Aries anyway? He got water splashed on him? That's what I read anyway. That's still only three of nine matches either way.
There was never going to be a storyline payoff to the end of Crimson's streak. Their chance for that went by the wayside with Morgan not getting the job done. Storm coming back was a huge deal and breaking the "undefeated" streak of Crimson was also a huge deal. Granted it would have been better if that streak had actually meant anything, but when combined, two huge deals makes a SUPER HUGE DEAL!!!#HEEL said:I don't mind the streak ending as it was one of the positives of the night but it didn't make sense storyline wise. Is there a reason Storm cared about Crimson's streak?
I agree that the hot potato shit with the tag belts was unnecessary but the match itself was great. I'm not sure what direction they want to take the tag titles in at this point as it appears TNA is pretty much solely focusing on singles stuff right now. The lack of a proper tag division IS something they need to assess, as its one thing that differs them from WWE, so perhaps they will do so in the near future. Just be thankful the damn KO's titles weren't on the line...and for that matter, why the hell wasn't EY at the show?#HEEL said:I am bitter that Kim lost to Tessmacher but the match itself also sucked and I was already not enjoying the show before that. Also throw in Angle and Styles winning the tag titles. How does that makes any sense? I don't get how they took the belts off Magnus and Joe (speaking of, did they forget about that team) to give them to Daniels and Kaz, only to hand them to Angle and Styles. What are Angle and Styles going to do as the tag team champs?
Don't be a negative Nancy. :#HEEL said:I'm glad you see positives because I really don't see many.
For the record, this is our second go around and I always find these little debates fun, since you know your stuff and don't resort to name calling or childish insults. And no, "negative Nancy" is NOT a childish insult dammit! :