TLC 2013 Poster

[John McHenry]

Yeah so two months to build up some sort of on screen romance, and perhaps shatter it?

Steph and HHH divide maybe?

 

[Chris]

Concept is good, but the execution is just meh, the split between the roses and weapon's looks awkward.

Also, disappointed there's no wrestler on the poster so I can't call people dumb for saying he's getting a big push.

EDIT: WAIT, THE ROSES OBVIOUSLY MEAN FANDANGOAT!

 

[John McHenry]

EDIT: WAIT, THE ROSES OBVIOUSLY MEAN FANDANGOAT!

Um, Rosa Mendes! DUH!

At least their trying now.

 

[Deezy]

Obviously means it's a Barrett rose ya dummies. He is going to don a white mask that covers only his eyes, wear a top hat with a cane and a cape while wearing a tuxedo. He saves the womens and singles one out by cakking her meatball head.

 

[Andrew]

this poster is hilarious.

 

[Nate]

It's amusing to read how people believe the poster's going to be part of some storyline or something. With the exception of Ryback at Battlegrounds, poster rarely mean anything towards stoylines in the WWE. And truth be told I think the image is suppose to compliment the caption that's written at the top.

But I actually somewhat like the poster this time. Granted not the best I've ever seen but WWE did a good job with this one.

 

[punk13]

Tulips Ladders and Chairs!! Darren Young will win

 

[Rated R Superstar]

Tulips Ladders and Chairs!! Darren Young will win

That ain't cool...

I actually like this poster. I won't buy the PPV based off it alone as I know some wrestlings actually do that. But it's not horrible.

 

[AF.]

I don't mind the new concept behind it. Better execution is needed though. This is pretty random.

 

[John McHenry]

It's amusing to read how people believe the poster's going to be part of some storyline or something. With the exception of Ryback at Battlegrounds, poster rarely mean anything towards stoylines in the WWE. And truth be told I think the image is suppose to compliment the caption that's written at the top.

But I actually somewhat like the poster this time. Granted not the best I've ever seen but WWE did a good job with this one.

But it used to and that's why some fans look for meaning in a poster. I mean I could slap JTG up on Elimination Chamber and according to you that makes perfect sense, even if he's not featured? That's simply not true. So even the guy on the poster should have something to do with it even if it is slight.

Now as for you relating it to the tag line. I honestly didn't even notice it until you pointed it out.

Now a poster is to entice you to buy said PPV I mean if you wanted to just have interesting photos bring back trading cards of feature them somehow. Now a Poster with say Cena on it at a PPV where Cena doesn't wrestle is going to piss someone off. Again the poster should sell the PPV.

 

[Keith]

But it used to and that's why some fans look for meaning in a poster. I mean I could slap JTG up on Elimination Chamber and according to you that makes perfect sense, even if he's not featured? That's simply not true. So even the guy on the poster should have something to do with it even if it is slight.

Now as for you relating it to the tag line. I honestly didn't even notice it until you pointed it out.

Now a poster is to entice you to buy said PPV I mean if you wanted to just have interesting photos bring back trading cards of feature them somehow. Now a Poster with say Cena on it at a PPV where Cena doesn't wrestle is going to piss someone off. Again the poster should sell the PPV.

Your making a bit of a pointless agrument its not like he was saying that Poster's shouldn't have any meaning to the show, just that nowadays they rarely do.

As for the poster? One word, crap.

 

[John McHenry]

Your making a bit of a pointless agrument its not like he was saying that Poster's shouldn't have any meaning to the show, just that nowadays they rarely do.

As for the poster? One word, crap.

Yeah How dare I have discussions and express opinions on a forum I'm such a dumbass. :sandow:

 

[Deezy]

OK is there an error on this page, because it says on my new posts that [MENTION=39]Keith[/MENTION] last posted, but I only see J-Macs post. Did he go nardwar and get a banhammer? what what what?

 

[John McHenry]

I see everything Perhaps it's something to do with Database reaload that occured yesterday.

 

[Deezy]

I see everything Perhaps it's something to do with Database reaload that occured yesterday.

Well I was on the mobile skin, which loads faster than the normal one, maybe it has something to with that.

And now see everything LOL@Keith - He is always entitled to his opinion, but everyone elses shouldn't count if he doesn't agree. Lpove that logic, see it at every forum site I go to.