I know, I was reinforcing your point with a more descriptive example.Well I mean, I did say in that post people vote for the letter not the person… so I mean I basically said that?
I know, I was reinforcing your point with a more descriptive example.Well I mean, I did say in that post people vote for the letter not the person… so I mean I basically said that?
Read it again. I said I wouldn’t vote for one who doesn’t believe in women's rights. If one was a moderate, and believed in a womens right to choose, and the dem they was against hadn’t got shit done and went against promises, I would strongly consider it, and read up on the Republican.Didn't you just say in this thread you never vote for someone with an R behind their name?
Does that mean you blindly vote Democrat?
Welp, you got me there I guess!so if the constitution - was legally changed the way you want them too. And it said "All Men must sucketh the mightiest of penis - at least once week" - and it was passed by federal law or amended how you feel. You wouldn't have any issue?
Oh. My bad.I know, I was reinforcing your point with a more descriptive example.
Politics is a game you play to win....fairness is a fallacy and being naive to that is why they win.....even though they don't even represent HALF the populations views on anything.oh then I guess you're lying to yourself, no one is having a meltdown here pal.
and regarding your whole liberals should just try harder...you do realize you're implying that liberals should bend the rules, refuse to follow due process and basically lower themselves to the level of what the GOP did. You see the problem with that is that people who lean left and vote these people, expect the people the elect to play by the rules and do things the right way. what your suggestion is power grabs and more extreme division. that hasn't really made the world better at all now has it? Why is it up the left side to do this? Why can't the right take responsibly for their more extreme compatriots and reign them in so that its actually possible to compromise and live in a productive society? I don't think its fair at all to pass the buck that way at all and just ignore the fact that the GOP has been acting insane and catering to religious extremist for over a decade now. the answer isnt more god damn extremism !!!!! you gusy tell me all the time im too extreme, so how can you sit here and say more extremism and power grabbing is the super easy answer....makes little to sense to me , good sir!
That's the exact opposite of what I said.@Deezy are you actually saying you dont think extreme christians didnt vote for trump???? thats his biggest base and he had pastors essentially calling him god's messenger. I have to ask, did you even think before saying that?
Welp, you got me there I guess!
chec
But in all seriousness, it was made very difficult to pass a law or amend the Constitution for a reason. Checks and balances folk. Checks and balances.
Depends on what you're talking about?Judge Juicy said:on a separate note - was leaving Europe for a better life, really worth it? And Discuss.