Can u post ur notes in full plz
yes I will be timing this request
D1
1. Chris
2. Nom Joined the anti-Junk sentiment, decent point about being bad as town or as scum to make that play. Potential good guy post 101
3. Jeff Involved in early suss on junk for weird play. Jeff gets aggressive with Tweet after Tweet calls Jeff out for assuming Tweet is scum. r00d. Then OMGUS votes.
4. Tweet Early vote on Junk. Generic explanation why. Quickly followed general thoughts Junk wouldn't be scum by unvoting. Seems to be doing a lot of following. junk votes tweet then tweet immediately offers to claim - weird play] Votes Jeff for assuming Tweet is town [dont give scum free info - Jeff] Tweet claims VT.
5. Ace
6. Barry
7. Odo Went fairly hard for Junk after weird early claim. Highlighted past scum QT where similar thing happened
8. Junk Weird push on Magic early, claimed it was real, then said it was fake. Claimed before executioner range. Votes Tweet for opportunism [not bad shout]. Claimed VT.
9. Ev Disagrees with Magic's read on Junk, thinks its legit botch. Doubles down on this a bit later. Hank also brings up Jeff/Tweet as possible dual-bussing s/s
10. Mikey
11. Magic Thinks Junk play is bad but gives reasons he thinks its town botch not scum based on past meta. Thinks Pez is town based on early post
12. Doddsy Claimed VT, thought Junk was fine, Odo less so and in general thought Tweet was fine except a slightly weird voting pattern
13. Lethal
14. Alco
15. Big Man
16. Brutus
17. TKOK
18. Chimp
19. Pez Effort into post looking at Junk. Open to both alignments with post. Questions Tweets' play.
20. Poyser
My thoguhts: Whole Tweet Jeff situation feels a bit anal but I haven't liked Tweet's general play