I was asked to share thoughts and that’s what I did.i'd prefer that if u have them as null to just say they r null or what side of null they r in without adding the extra descriptions that doesnt tell me much. essentially boils down to: wang is doing this townie thing but could be scum. barry is doing this townie thing but could be scum playing it good. this is fence sitting
you also essentially gave the players an out and told them what to do in order to get a good read from you, which tells me u arent interested in solving them much.
even the sky read was actually an overexplaination imo. could it be ur nature to just overexplain stuff unnecessarily, maybe?
lastly i dont think how much is left in the day or how many ppl agree with me shud affect my scum read of you or my willingness to flip you
I explained my position on players and why I felt that way with some other comments. That, to me, is more helpful than
Sky - town
Blaine - mafia
etc.
Because by just listing a bunch of names and a read next to them doesn’t tell anyone why I’m thinking what I’m thinking. Whether you think that’s necessary or not, I frankly don’t care. Because I can almost guarantee if I just listed names and a read I’d get asked why I felt that way about certain players.
How have I given people an out, can I ask? You’ve said me commenting on a player being active and making good posts and that I like they’re doing that is a bad thing. I couldn’t say for sure at that point in time that Wang, Grim, Sky or anyone was town with great confidence as the game had just started. There wasn’t exactly much to go off.
Just because I’m not as gung-ho as you and mark someone (incorrectly, I must add) as nailed on scum based on about 7 posts does not mean that there’s anything wrong with how I choose to play.