I strongly feel like I've done the former more than the latter, and I actually find your contention here to be mostly semantics. For clarity, the "words I'm putting into your mouth" where me saying that you added your 2 cents into the Sky vote thing and then said "but I don't know if Sky does this normally", when you actually said "albeit I don't know Sky". Me drawing what I did from it just looks obvious to me, if you can't see that then we're at an impasse.
Again, I said I’d never played with Sky. Nothing about knowing them or knowing how they play. What I said is implicit that I don’t know them or how they play, of course, but the main point of the post was to say that I agreed with the discourse that the vote was clearly a joke, which everyone (apart from Lethal at the time) agreed with.
I think we are at an impasse on your interpretation of that post, and your treatment of it. When you say things like “he said X”, that’s not an expression of you interpretation of the post. That’s you quoting what I said, which you did not several times.
Notwithstanding, none of this explains away why you said that I waited for someone else to comment on it before commenting myself. I explained the timings of my posts which you’ve not commented on.
You also have not discussed any of my play or posts in between the post you initially quoted any my input on the Juice list. This is relevant as at one point you presented it as such that was my only involvement in the game.
At the moment I feel like you are backtracking on what you were initially putting out there. You initial reasoning was weak to your admission but why then did you add on the aforementioned as a means to justify it when challenged?
Also at no point did you ask me what I meant. My initial defence when I first dignified this with a response explaining what I meant after you misquoted.
