- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 77,196
- Reaction score
- 9,527
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 26
Fair enoughYou tell it the same way they told the story with Goldberg. Brock underestimated him. Goldberg caught him off guard. In a fight, all it takes is one lucky shot
Fair enoughYou tell it the same way they told the story with Goldberg. Brock underestimated him. Goldberg caught him off guard. In a fight, all it takes is one lucky shot
Real shit.nah I dont think it would matter at mania with no actual stakes. crowd would pop and Brock just fights someone else on Monday. or takes a break. Agree with Walker, dude is Teflon he could lose 5 times in a row and it would not really matter. Seth is less over and lost a million times to Cody and is fine, crowds dont give a shit about wins and losses in wwe imo
I would argue he might be more over than he has ever been lmaoReal shit.
Think about his last year. He lost to Lashley at Rumble. Lost to Roman at Mania. Lost to Roman again at Summerslam. Got dumped from the Rumble by Lashley. Lost to Lashley at EC.
And yet when that guitar rift hits, he’s getting pop’s only challenged by Roman and Cody
I mean it makes sense and would explain the shitty finish at EC
if its money, could just be Austin isnt interested in that match and gave a stupid asking price they know is outrageous. fairly common tacticIf WWE wanted the match between Steve Austin and Brock to happen then they would’ve made it happen. The rumor is Steve turned it down cause of money. Am I supposed to believe that WWE just straight up lowballed him and expected him to except? And then they moved Brock vs Bobby up to the Chamber because of a match that wasn’t guaranteed? Spare me
if its money, could just be Austin isnt interested in that match and gave a stupid asking price they know is outrageous. fairly common tactic