I don't know what show you have been seeing, but HHH gets cheered OVER Jeff Hardy.
And I can't believe that you actually used Mark Henry as an example to prove your point about Taker. Mark Henry is Taker's personal bitch, just as Khali.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlL7MLUDp9s
You'll obviously try to say "well that was his debut, of course they'll do that!" Well, when was the last time something like that happened to Triple H? As for Henry, he raped Undertaker and in kayfabe took him out for months. "But wait, Roxxi, that was just so Undertaker could have time off!" Um, when was the last time Triple H let something like that happen to him?
And oh, so, just because they stood over Taker they are stronger?
Well that's what the marks are trying to say is "putting over", when Jeff/Kozlov cheapshot Triple H and then stand over him to end the show.
Khali: Khali took out Taker..then lost a LAST MAN STANDING MATCH.
Bolded the important part. When was the last time Khali not only took out Taker, but utterly decimated him while no-selling some of his signature moves? (I say "signature moves" rather than punches because Undertaker is constantly hyped as the best pure striker in the business) On a
debut, no less?
Kennedy: Yeah, he got on fire on his feud with Taker, but it wasn't because of Taker losing to him, because each time they fought and Kennedy won it was because of cheatery, yeah, until Taker send Kennedy to his LAST RIDE.
Heaving him off the set is cheating? No, it's hardcore. Kennedy didn't get over because of a few cheap rakes to the eyes. He got over because he raped Undertaker in that ring. Yes, he lost, but again,
when was the last time Triple H was assaulted that badly by a midcarder in a match, when he saw it coming and didn't stop it from happening because he flat out COULD NOT OVERCOME HIS OPPONENT?
Big Daddy V: Blood. Gogoplata, tap out in seconds. Yeah, real put over.
Torture rack, unconscious Taker. Yes, I realize that this was assisted by Henry and it wasn't actually in a match, but as long as we're going with this theory that cheapshots outside a match equate to "putting over", I get to use those examples too.
Undertaker may ultimately win his feuds, but during them, he's the midcarders' bitch. His opponents don't just get a few weak little lucky shots; no, they lay the hammer down on Undertaker. They may lose, but they walk away stronger for it. With Triple H? Ha, no.
He hasn't "buried" anyone yet in his title run, unless you want to count Shelton/Kendrick, which would be a joke since they shouldn't have been in the main event anyways.
Yeah, they're not talented enough for the main event, no sir. And Kendrick? Pfft, he has no heat; his mic skills are a complete joke and the fact that he calls himself a high flyer is an insult to everyone who uses that wrestling style. He's completely and utterly untalented, DEFINITELY less entertaining to watch than the champions we have now and therefore completely undeserving of any title run. After all, he's unimpressive and he has no mic skills.
Oh wait. :shifty:
As for his title run, I agree it's been kinda meh, but I've enjoyed it regardless since it's Triple H.
Aren't you a little old to be this blatant of a mark? I can admit when Roxxi's curse like a sailor promos are completely forced and barely watchable, and the fact that it's Nikki Roxx there doesn't "make it ok." So what, the title run sucks, but that's ok because it's Triple H doing the sucking and therefore the sucking does not suck? What kind of paradox of marking is this? The
phone company doesn't hit me with such a bemusing maze of circular logic.
MVP can go on the mic, so can Kendrick, and go in the ring. But is it time to give them the belt? No. Neither man is a Main Eventer, and people would just tune out. TBK hasn't even been in a mid-card feud yet, he was in the scramble and besides that it has been squashes. Yay, champion!
Kozlov squashed jobbers for half a year, and now he's challenging the champions and people are buying it.