- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Messages
- 248,913
- Reaction score
- 78,119
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 38
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
basically the Robb Fee or wtv role in WWE, but with some media stuff tacked on from what I understand
this Cole Jericho feud is fantastic so far tooIt certainly didn’t hurt. I love having both here.
I love how Booty is the only member on here who gets me, lol. I never technically said I didn't like her anymore and even or even outright hate her. A lot of my "hate" to her or even criticism was in character with a hint of my true feelings behind it so.I didn’t know who she was until All In, but I’m just saying here during AEW live discussions I was one of the only people that said this is the girl.
But, not sure you can be that girl anyway if you don’t like her anymore.
To be fair, Jeff asked what changed when you said you were a fan so I took that as your weren’t a fan.I love how Booty is the only member on here who gets me, lol. I never technically said I didn't like her anymore and even or even outright hate her. A lot of my "hate" to her or even criticism was in character with a hint of my true feelings behind it so.
I think they did book someone twice this week but he just got there lol, I could be wrong tho i may be thinking of last week.If he’s in charge of continuity I’m hoping his first rule is not to book anyone twice in a week. You have a large roster and 5 hours to book.
Fair, and I may explain it as I have an idea on how to now. It is just that I am person that makes no sense and sense at the same time, lolTo be fair, Jeff asked what changed when you said you were a fan so I took that as your weren’t a fan.
I stated I wasn't precisely talking about the trios. It was a blanket statement about my opinion on just match rules in wrestling.its literally three rules though. 20 count, no rope break, no dq optional (this one was said a bit weird, unmsure if they meant its all no dq or if opponent can choose a stip, fairly certain its just no qu optional though)
that seems fairly simple to me
I would have a segment of some kind on Collision to lead to a match on Dynamite or Rampage, but yeah, once in a while is fine. I just don’t want like 10 people getting booked twice a week and people sitting home for a month straight.I think they did book someone twice this week but he just got there lol, I could be wrong tho i may be thinking of last week.
I dont mind if ppl are on both shows once in a while if the story calls for it, like if someone gets ganked after their match on Dynamite and gank their rival back on Collision for example. But yeah, I agree in principle more ppl need an opportunity to run with the ball
10-4I stated I wasn't precisely talking about the trios. It was a blanket statement about my opinion on just match rules in wrestling.
I’ll say if we’re talking generally I especially think simple is overrated sometimes. I think it limits innovation. Especially new match types. Nothing really new can be bore using simplicity.I stated I wasn't precisely talking about the trios. It was a blanket statement about my opinion on just match rules in wrestling.
I strongly disagree. There’s a million simple matches. It’s nice creating something new once in a while.10-4
for example I know the match ended up being really fun but that Iron Survivor Challenge was a lot of rules. or that Impact one thats whack too from the mid 00s
I mean, truly it goes with any sporting type thing. Even in outside of wrestling, sports that tend to build rules, upon rules, upon rules can definitely take people out of just watching for enjoyment.10-4
for example I know the match ended up being really fun but that Iron Survivor Challenge was a lot of rules. or that Impact one thats whack too from the mid 00s