WS Mafia II: THE REBUILD - Game Thread

[Leon TrotSky]

I'm not against claiming but I know what sky is thinking and it's literally nonsense

Well, if you say it's nonsense, why not prove it is before more pressure gets to you?

Unvote
Vote Doddsy

 

[Doddsy]

I mean fine.

Me, sky and big man are 3 way masons.

It's utter nonsense to suspect me of janitoring someone who's role is provable by 2 people.

Same way I'm not going to suspect you for it because it's just so stupid to do

 

[Kajuh]

Lethal's Reads/Leans log

1. Haza ~ Not a flying fucks chance he busses that Juice role like he did as scum. I also love his methodical approach to building his Jeff case, complete with multiple receipts.
2. Jeff ~ Seemed to handle himself well with Haza's case for mine, but did show a hint of changing his goal posts once being called out on the lack of offensive hunting. Will be following this with interest.
3. Rugrat - null
5. Alco - null
6. CP ~ Do not believe a team with himself and Juice on it start that absolute WOAT argument over nothing and allow it to transpire to the meltdown modkill
7. MI$$ BLI$$ - null
8. Kajuh - null
9. Sky ~ classic Sky. I always read her scum in the past, so for the spirit of pals and new leaves, throw this one on
10. Barry ~ struggling to recall a time when he was this invested in the game. It's most excellent as I'll hope to form a solid opinion without relying upon guess work
11. Doddsy - null
12. Big Man ~ Made a similar observation to Haza in regards to Jeff
13. Blaine ~ Bizarre claim and a bullshit excuse about not being able to access a QT
14. Brutus - null
15. Tweet ~ Implicated in the juice drama, but he isn't above a good old fashioned bus. However, his play felt genuine here
16. Ace - null
17. Lethal ~ Duh

Alco is here now though, so I'm going to hopefuly be able to switch my null. Hard though since I always have a tendency to not trust him.

In the spirit of not just basing all my reads off of ViBeZ, I didn't like this read on Sky. All of his other reads had actual game-related reasons for them and then the read on Sky is just... because? Why not just leave her null?

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

So if i could get some bullet points be much love

 

[Leon TrotSky]

I mean fine.

Me, sky and big man are 3 way masons.

It's utter nonsense to suspect me of janitoring someone who's role is provable by 2 people.

Same way I'm not going to suspect you for it because it's just so stupid to do

Oh, my.

I was just going to suggest you being scum is possible (because town/scum masons are certainly possible, and a 2/1 ratio for such would make sense). I would never have said anything about you being a janitor.

SLIP?

 

[Doddsy]

Oh, my.

I was just going to suggest you being scum is possible (because town/scum masons are certainly possible, and a 2/1 ratio for such would make sense). I would never have said anything about you being a janitor.

SLIP?

Is this a genuine post

 

[Leon TrotSky]

Is this a genuine post

Why wouldn't it be? Or are you just trying to brush it off?

 

[Doddsy]

Because as I said, big man died to a janitor. We both know what role he has and are able to say it in the thread.

Why the hell would I okay a janitor shot on someone who's role can't be used or hidden?

 

[Comrade Khan]

sky I see a bit of an issue in your logic here.

you said earlier youd rather go after live scum rather than the traitor yes?

while i dont disagree that often the 1/3 rule is a decent enough rule, its certainly not binary. and i would argue, if i was a host with 3 people in a qt like you guys are claiming ( unless theres more ur not telling us), that probably where i would stick the traitor if anything.

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

im legitimately so confused

 

[Comrade Khan]

like obviously host wifom but scum having direct access to a large 2nd QT right off the bat seems a bit overpowered at face value, to me .

also why would they janitor someone in a group that, in theory, could be used later down the line? Im kind of lacking the scum logic there I guess

 

[Leon TrotSky]

sky I see a bit of an issue in your logic here.

you said earlier youd rather go after live scum rather than the traitor yes?

while i dont disagree that often the 1/3 rule is a decent enough rule, its certainly not binary. and i would argue, if i was a host with 3 people in a qt like you guys are claiming ( unless theres more ur not telling us), that probably where i would stick the traitor if anything.

I have CP as the traitor for potentially flavour related reasons. I personally wouldn't consider Doddsy as a likely traitor for that reason

 

[RDK]

the no character claiming allowed makes it perfectly feasible for there to be t/t/t mason

 

[Kajuh]

It was tiresome. I saw that there was a modkill in the OP and expected some form of meltdown. I was disappointed to be disappointed at the sheer depths of how it transpired. Waa waa waa this is different to how I play elsewhere. People hate me because i'm always voted day 1. For fucks sake, everyone gets voted day 1, everyone is suspect of each other, it's the fucking game. Mentally unstable bitches need to be kept on a leash. With her mentality during these games, it's kinda clear the force fucked her off.

But as tiresome as the read back was, I'm quite content to establish some reads which i'll jot down soon

And finally, he seemed the most irritated with Juice's modkill. Probably because he lost a teammate with really good roles.

 

[Doddsy]

sky I see a bit of an issue in your logic here.

you said earlier youd rather go after live scum rather than the traitor yes?

while i dont disagree that often the 1/3 rule is a decent enough rule, its certainly not binary. and i would argue, if i was a host with 3 people in a qt like you guys are claiming ( unless theres more ur not telling us), that probably where i would stick the traitor if anything.

Nah I don't think so unless it was big man.

Sky's theory about the traitor doesn't make sense to direct traitor thoughts at other people if she wants to be found