UWF - Discussion

[EffectsofRaven]

Yeah, I mean it's gonna be fiercy defended by Sandow, that's without a doubt technically it could be the most exciting championship in UWF because ANYONE could get a chance to win it on any given week.

Also, why is my two worse multi-man matches I've wrote are getting voted for match of the month... NONSENSE :|

 

[The Hoov]

Also, why is my two worse multi-man matches I've wrote are getting voted for match of the month... NONSENSE :|

Because of that fantastic ending to the MITB match! YES!

 

[Cwalker]

Yeah, I mean it's gonna be fiercy defended by Sandow, that's without a doubt technically it could be the most exciting championship in UWF because ANYONE could get a chance to win it on any given week.

Also, why is my two worse multi-man matches I've wrote are getting voted for match of the month... NONSENSE :|

Because Pay Per View main events are the only matches that apparently get voted for. Duh!

 

[Chris Dresdon]

Because Pay Per View main events are the only matches that apparently get voted for. Duh!

That's a fair point you've made, sir. I had never before noticed that, sadly.

 

[CaptainxBumout]

Because Pay Per View main events are the only matches that apparently get voted for. Duh!

Makes perfect sense. Bigger matches have better matches. Weekly matches are good but it seems writing goes all out for PPV main events. Makes sense that they're voted match of the month.

 

[Cwalker]

Makes perfect sense. Bigger matches have better matches. Weekly matches are good but it seems writing goes all out for PPV main events. Makes sense that they're voted match of the month.

Personally; I don't think bigger matches equate to better matches. It's similar to trash talking in the sense that just like longer trash talks are deemed "better" than there shorter counterparts, longer matches are deemed better than shorter ones. People say quality over quantity when it comes to trash talks, same thing holds true for matches.

Take the Money in The Bank match for instance. It was a good match, but people remember it for being the main event and Bray Wyatt joining YES. Outside of the swerve, I've seen two matches on Smackdown and written one for Raw that I thought was better and more intriguing in the past few weeks. I understand where you're coming from, but I think it's a flawed way to look at it.

 

[Slim]

Its definitely flawed but to be real... its the laziness of the majority that they would rather just "vote" and the easiest thing to pick is the main event of a PPV rather than look through show cards.

Plus so many will tout "quality over quantity" but I highly doubt even 90% of the people that say that can even differentiate between the two. They'll think that oh its shorter and the other is longer so the shorter is quality. Nope. It requires reading and that goes to the wayside. Mannn I'ma go on a rant if I continue... but yeah. That's pretty much it.

Oh yeah I wanted to do somethin to day but... I left the house at about 930am... made it back home at midnight. Tomorrow morning I'm lookin for tires I'm still hoping to get my first TT up either Monday or Tuesday.

 

[CaptainxBumout]

I didnt mean longer matches as we all know that's not the case but let's be honest, not everyone reads every match. I'd say maybe 5 or so people actually read every match. PPV matches are sort of seen like an end to feuds and ultimately the favorite of the matches. Plus some people really like the gimmick matches. Different strokes for different folks. Is it laziness to vote for said matches? Yes and no. Yes because since its a PPV match, more people have probably read it than say a RAW or Smackdown match since people tend to just read stuff involving them. No because well technically that is the best match they've read so it makes sense.

 

[EffectsofRaven]

Take the Money in The Bank match for instance. It was a good match, but people remember it for being the main event and Bray Wyatt joining YES. Outside of the swerve, I've seen two matches on Smackdown and written one for Raw that I thought was better and more intriguing in the past few weeks. I understand where you're coming from, but I think it's a flawed way to look at it.

I felt personally I wrote better stuff this month for Smackdown like Cena vs Wyatt or Sting vs D-Bry and the NXT title match, I personally think we should do a weekly match of the month because SBS always seems to come up with at least one fantastic weekly match a month and so do you Cwalker.

Plus the fact, me personally felt I wrote a much better match at Summerslam which Goldust/Hawkins.

 

[Lewb]

Soooooo....... yeah. I'm kind of semi back. Hello there.

 

[Slim]

Sup homie. Semi welcome back. heh

I do wanna say I was hoping to get a TT done today but... if not tonight then tomorrow. I haven't had any real time to just chill since Sunday morning so yeah... finally catching a break.

 

[Andrew]

I'll have my TT tomorrow.

 

[Rated R Superstar]

In a few more weeks(hopefully) I'll have my new computer. So I can probably TT! WOOOO!

 

[SBS]

Big News Folks, Congratulations are in order as today marks Dresden's 120th day as Champion thus passing Itchweed's record of 118 days making him the longest reigning Champion in the history of UWF. Let's give a nice round of applause for the Hell Raisin SOB on the achievement all!

 

[Rated R Superstar]

Fuck that's impressive. If you're not champion for a full year Dresden, I will have given up on you. (Motivation motherfucker!)