Tiger King Mafia Game Thread

[Lawls]

Well Phenom has to be town based on the whole missing role PM thing right? Or is that a dangerous thought process to go down?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Also @Poyser why did you start a wagon on smark n then did not follow up on it or ask cp why he followed u?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Well Phenom has to be town based on the whole missing role PM thing right? Or is that a dangerous thought process to go down?

Phenom should b null. Discarding host wifom as its stupid to base a read on it imo

 

[Evans]

Well Phenom has to be town based on the whole missing role PM thing right? Or is that a dangerous thought process to go down?

I honestly think we just disregard the cock up and not get stuck into WIFOM speculation. N0M could be any 3 alignments after his role went out late.

 

[Alco]

Here's the entire interaction building around Smark's vote for N0M.




The vote on N0M is a joke by Smark who then after he votes makes a comment about how N0M's jokes felt weird and then unvoted after it was revealed that N0M didn't receive a role PM - which OMB then confirmed.

What about this feels constructed to you?

So Smark votes Phenom as a joke, but then he adds reasoning to it (aka it's no longer a joke?)? That in itself sounds contradictory, E-V.

I think that post there where he says

"His joke about shooting me, then not getting his role and then joking about not having his role.

Jokes are jokes on day 1, but feels like a weird walk back when questioned about his joke kill. "

looked like a reach. And I saw someone talk about fabricating reasons and this felt applicable to me in this case.

 

[Alco]

No, not at all. I'm suggesting the post you liked just builds into the picture of you buddying Poyser about Jeff and voting Smark for WIFOM reasons and disputing the OMGUS on CPs post liking behaviour.

Wait how is talking about CP's liking behavior OMGUS? I'm not even accusing him of anything lol

And it's not WIFOM, Evans. Not from my point of view it's not.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

So Smark votes Phenom as a joke, but then he adds reasoning to it (aka it's no longer a joke?)? That in itself sounds contradictory, E-V.

I think that post there where he says

"His joke about shooting me, then not getting his role and then joking about not having his role.

Jokes are jokes on day 1, but feels like a weird walk back when questioned about his joke kill. "

looked like a reach. And I saw someone talk about fabricating reasons and this felt applicable to me in this case.

So surely, you should hate tweets vote on rugrat too

 

[Canadian Dragon]

And the fabrication point was mine

 

[Bobby Barrows]

I understand where you're coming from in regards to the genuineness of Jeff but I don't think there's much to the reaction test other than activity for activities sake.

I mean, this was a weird post:



Smark only had 2 votes that I've seen you and CP. I haven't seen any posts about 2002 wrestling listed as a reason

I don't think I ever voted Smark.

 

[Odo]

Well Phenom has to be town based on the whole missing role PM thing right? Or is that a dangerous thought process to go down?

I would say that any post he made before that should be disregarded

 

[Chris]

Content with giving Evans a town lean rn, I had similar thoughts on Alco when reading back before I got to Evans voting him. How do you feel about Smark's unvote once it was revealed N0M didn't get his PM?

 

[Chris]

That question was to Alco btw...almost edited

 

[Alco]

I'm sorry, I don't think there's any real case here on me.

Also Banez' follow there, when he's had no more than 5 posts, among which "no reads" and "I get town vibes from Poyser", doesn't look like the Banez from last game at all. Something I noticed just now.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Stop no selling me ppl n tell me why you are starting all these cases n no selling tweets vote

 

[Bobby Barrows]

Stop no selling me ppl n tell me why you are starting all these cases n no selling tweets vote

Can I ask your case on Tweet please? If it's just Gut read with nothing really to base it on, then wouldn't you technically be guilty of the same thing you're accusing people voting you for, which is having no real reason to vote someone?