Tiger King Mafia Game Thread

[Poyser]

Also I will say I don’t hate the points about alco either

 

[Banez]

vote Alco

I think we should put some pressure on him then.

 

[Evans]

vote Alco

Yup.

 

[Alco]

I'm gonna return back to Alco now I'm gloriously in a 25 minute long queue on the phone in work

Looks like Alco is buddying up to Poyser early. Might be helpful later.



I've addressed why this is meh reasoning so far but it's funny that you've voted Smark yet are buddying up with Poyser about Jeff.





(quoted this post as Alco dropped a little like on it).

> OMB doesn't send N0M his role
> N0M posts without role
> Smark votes N0M based off of this
> Alco votes Smark
> Alco then agrees with Poyser across multiple posts and says Jeff is using a D1 reaction test as a crutch against Barry/Smark
> Alco still votes Smark.

Strikes me as odd but hey, we're only halfway through the day!

But what I think about Smark is not really connected to Jeff as such? Jeff didn't go after Smark as far as I know? So why can't I agree with Poyser about his Jeff points but at the same time still feel Smark's posts around Phenom were not satisfactory?

Jeff and Smark could be aligned for all I know

 

[Alco]

I don't really understand how that goes against me in this case, as if I've connected Jeff and Smark or something

Also the word "buddying" gets thrown around way too easily. Is CP buddying up to everyone he's giving a like?

 

[Evans]

But what I think about Smark is not really connected to Jeff as such? Jeff didn't go after Smark as far as I know? So why can't I agree with Poyser about his Jeff points but at the same time still feel Smark's posts around Phenom were not satisfactory?

Jeff and Smark could be aligned for all I know

Your reasoning on Smark was pure WIFOM because N0M was posting without a role PM tbh.

I just find it odd that you'd continue to keep your vote on Smark after agreeing with Poyser that Jeff's reaction test didn't feel genuine against Smark or Barry.

 

[Evans]

I don't really understand how that goes against me in this case, as if I've connected Jeff and Smark or something

Also the word "buddying" gets thrown around way too easily. Is CP buddying up to everyone he's giving a like?

CP likes a lot of posts but the posts vary from points he agrees with / joke posts. You liked a very specific post quoting myself, discrediting Jeffs reaction test

 

[Evans]

as if I've connected Jeff and Smark or something

Also, no-one has said this

 

[Alco]

Your reasoning on Smark was pure WIFOM because N0M was posting without a role PM tbh.

I just find it odd that you'd continue to keep your vote on Smark after agreeing with Poyser that Jeff's reaction test didn't feel genuine against Smark or Barry.

No, that's not true. I looked at how Smark voted Phenom and it looked at a fabrication of reasons to vote someone. Whether Phenom had received his pm or no is irrelevant for me in this case. It's Smark who (in my eyes) clutched at something. This is completely disconnected from Jeff's reaction test on Smark/Barry imo.

I can find both Smark's construction there and Jeff's play questionable, they're not communicating vessels.

 

[Lawls]

Who is OMB?

Someone fill me on on who is who in terms of users please.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Omb is tiger king, the host. Also you can forget about wagoning me. Its just not happening today, period.

 

[Alco]

CP likes a lot of posts but the posts vary from points he agrees with / joke posts. You liked a very specific post quoting myself, discrediting Jeffs reaction test

So when I like a post it goes under the magnifying glass, but when CP likes posts there's no issue ? Not that I say there should be an issue, on the contrary, I just think different people are regarded differently here (as happened to me two games ago as well).

 

[Evans]

No, that's not true. I looked at how Smark voted Phenom and it looked at a fabrication of reasons to vote someone. Whether Phenom had received his pm or no is irrelevant for me in this case. It's Smark who (in my eyes) clutched at something. This is completely disconnected from Jeff's reaction test on Smark/Barry imo.

I can find both Smark's construction there and Jeff's play questionable, they're not communicating vessels.

Here's the entire interaction building around Smark's vote for N0M.

Spoiler: N0M x Smark Vote Interaction

Quite real. Now

is that a joke about how I shot at you 3 times in 2 games?

Very much so.

Speaking of. Vote Nom.

Revenge vote.

I potentially could make it 4 in 3 nights, but I’m not sure

His joke about shooting me, then not getting his role and then joking about not having his role.

Jokes are jokes on day 1, but feels like a weird walk back when questioned about his joke kill.

Nom also should have posted without a role pm. That's weird tbh.

Unvote.

The vote on N0M is a joke by Smark who then after he votes makes a comment about how N0M's jokes felt weird and then unvoted after it was revealed that N0M didn't receive a role PM - which OMB then confirmed.

What about this feels constructed to you?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Also why are people up my ass about smark when i want to push tweet. No one has commented on his terrible vote on rugrat and his awful reason to what was obviously a joke post. Stop being dense n vote with me tbh

 

[Evans]

So when I like a post it goes under the magnifying glass, but when CP likes posts there's no issue ? Not that I say there should be an issue, on the contrary, I just think different people are regarded differently here (as happened to me two games ago as well).

No, not at all. I'm suggesting the post you liked just builds into the picture of you buddying Poyser about Jeff and voting Smark for WIFOM reasons and disputing the OMGUS on CPs post liking behaviour.