The Political Thread

[Chris]

If you only want handguns legal, then yes. But I mean, I thought you agreed with me on the earlier proposals I made. If you agree to that, that’s a compromise and that’s not extreme.

I don't think every form of gun or weapon should be legal, I assumed that was too extreme for you to compromise with me

 

[Smart Marx]

Your government don't use AK 47s tho.

Also your government have nuclear weapons....so Cletus should be allowed to have a missile silo on his farm?

Bombs aren’t protected. Arms are guns.

 

[Chris]

Banning guns isn’t a compromise.

banning all guns isn't compromise

 

[Smart Marx]

I don't think every form of gun or weapon should be legal, I assumed that was too extreme for you to compromise with me

If you’re willing to pass bills that don’t ban guns, that’s not extreme. Extreme for me is if that’s all you want to do. If you can come to the table to pass laws that can help do everything but, that’s compromise.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

If you only want handguns legal, then yes.

But I mean, I thought you agreed with me on the earlier proposals I made. If you agree to that, that’s a compromise and that’s not extreme.

AR-15s are not all rifles, Smark.

You take away AR-15s and many semi-automatic rifles, that is still a massive log of bolt-action, lever-action, pump-action weapons, not to mention revolvers, handguns, hunting rifles, etc. etc. etc. would still be constitutional. Plus a provision of military experience would add an exemption to handling semi-automatic or even automatic weapons is more than reasonable.

I don't know why being burrow-headed like this is fine. Compromise is good, and my take on this is probably the best case scenario for both Democrats and Republicans. Not all guns are banned, Republicans will still have plenty of choices of weaponry to choose from, and Democrats will have the AR-15 legislation done. Additionally, military personnel can still have those bigger weapons.

What could be more reasonable than that?

 

[Deezy]

Bombs aren’t protected. Arms are guns.

Arms were muskets when that motherfucker was written up.

So if you want to be literal, use muskets, by all rights....do it up fam.

 

[Chris]

If you’re willing to pass bills that don’t ban guns, that’s not extreme. Extreme for me is if that’s all you want to do. If you can come to the table to pass laws that can help do everything but, that’s compromise.

It's not all I want to do but I see that it's on the democrats to compromise bc Republicans won't budge at all clearly if Beto is deemed to extreme

 

[Hidden Blaze]

I don't think every form of gun or weapon should be legal, I assumed that was too extreme for you to compromise with me

Yeah, this is my stance. Like they are some that I’m just like no too.

 

[Comrade Khan]

Banning guns isn’t a compromise.

once again, no one is banning GUNS. thats what your saying so it fits your narrow minded argument so you wont have to move. chris has demontrated yo you over and over again no one is saying banning all guns and no matter how many times you say ''banning guns'' and think it means banninmg all guns it doesnt. i dont know why you cant just admit that banning types of guns, or ammunition, or putting limits on clips for examples = banning all guns. thats exactly the shit they want you to think and to fool you into thinkin the big bad democrats want your guns. your faling for it, hook line and sinker. genuinely hope you actually start thinking instead of regurgitating all the GOP favorite fear tactics. NO ONE WANTS TO BAN GUNS. stop.

 

[Smart Marx]

banning all guns isn't compromise

Banning rifles, when it’s the favorite amongst many groups for self defense isn’t a compromise.

That Uvalde shooting wouldn’t be any different if he walked in there with two handguns and four clips.

I don’t why people think rifles are why a man can kill 14 kids when the police wouldn’t go inside.

 

[Chris]

Yeah, this is my stance. Like they are some that I’m just like no too.

don't say this if you run for office, you will lose every republican vote

 

[Smart Marx]

once again, no one is banning GUNS. thats what your saying so it fits your narrow minded argument so you wont have to move. chris has demontrated yo you over and over again no one is saying banning all guns and no matter how many times you say ''banning guns'' and think it means banninmg all guns it doesnt. i dont know why you cant just admit that banning types of guns, or ammunition, or putting limits on clips for examples = banning all guns. thats exactly the shit they want you to think and to fool you into thinkin the big bad democrats want your guns. your faling for it, hook line and sinker. genuinely hope you actually start thinking instead of regurgitating all the GOP favorite fear tactics. NO ONE WANTS TO BAN GUNS. stop.

Rifles are guns. If you want to ban rifles, you want to ban guns.

 

[Smart Marx]

AR-15s are not all rifles, Smark.

You take away AR-15s and many semi-automatic rifles, that is still a massive log of bolt-action, lever-action, pump-action weapons, not to mention revolvers, handguns, hunting rifles, etc. etc. etc. would still be constitutional. Plus a provision of military experience would add an exemption to handling semi-automatic or even automatic weapons is more than reasonable.

I don't know why being burrow-headed like this is fine. Compromise is good, and my take on this is probably the best case scenario for both Democrats and Republicans. Not all guns are banned, Republicans will still have plenty of choices of weaponry to choose from, and Democrats will have the AR-15 legislation done. Additionally, military personnel can still have those bigger weapons.

What could be more reasonable than that?

Semi-automatic rifles*

You understand what I mean.

 

[Deezy]

I like how nun chucks, brass knucks and butterfly blades are banned.

It's funny how certain guns that are not meant for anything else but war, shouldn't be.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Rifles are guns. If you want to ban rifles, you want to ban fans.

Who said anything about banning fans? You a fucking fanist now?