OOC The Out Of Character Thread

[Closed]

That's a bad rule. The people who're good at kickouts are getting restricted on how good they are at kickouts because some people aren't as good at kickouts as some others. TBH (And I love me some honesty, and take this how you will boss man) But your only real weakness at this game is kickouts and if you came across someone who're good at them and who can take your dominence throughout 90% of a match and keep kicking out to the point that we can hit a finisher or 2 on you and you get pinned because you've even admitted to not being that good at them. This seems hella fishy to me as you restricting kickouts to benefit you because you suck at them while guys like Me, Gino and others can kickout more than 3 times. As I proved to you yesterday, the only way that I am capable of beating you is by weathering the storm because you're a destroyer in a match (Gino can attest to that) and kicking out of your shit long enough that I can slowly deplete your health with the few moves that I can hit and a finisher or 2. If this restriction would happen, there'd be more competition between everyone else... Except for you. Just my thought on it. So, IMO, no. I should be allowed to be as good at kickouts as I am and not be restricted just because you suck at them.

I'm probably not even going to be here for much longer (playing in the league) so it doesn't make any difference to me. I thought people might want this to rule to make the league more competitive

 

[Filet-o-Fish]

That's a bad rule. The people who're good at kickouts are getting restricted on how good they are at kickouts because some people aren't as good at kickouts as some others. TBH (And I love me some honesty, and take this how you will boss man) But your only real weakness at this game is kickouts and if you came across someone who're good at them and who can take your dominence throughout 90% of a match and keep kicking out to the point that we can hit a finisher or 2 on you and you get pinned because you've even admitted to not being that good at them. This seems hella fishy to me as you restricting kickouts to benefit you because you suck at them while guys like Me, Gino and others can kickout more than 3 times. As I proved to you yesterday, the only way that I am capable of beating you is by weathering the storm because you're a destroyer in a match (Gino can attest to that) and kicking out of your shit long enough that I can slowly deplete your health with the few moves that I can hit and a finisher or 2. If this restriction would happen, there'd be more competition between everyone else... Except for you. Just my thought on it. So, IMO, no. I should be allowed to be as good at kickouts as I am and not be restricted just because you suck at them.

 

[Closed]

Actually... I kind of agree with this. Me and @Solarxpixel kicked out of about 8 finishers in our 3 stages of hell match... each... and that was just on one fall. Not spoiling anything else....

it's very unrealistic to kick out of 8 finishers like that. When have we ever seen anyone in a real wrestling match kick out of 7 or more finishers?

 

[Welsh-Wizard-97]

it's very unrealistic to kick out of 8 finishers like that. When have we ever seen anyone in a real wrestling match kick out of 7 or more finishers?

Ever seen a John Cena vs Randy Orton match?

 

[Closed]

putting this to a vote guys. I want the league to decide for me

 

[Welsh-Wizard-97]

So, I'm a black president?

 

[Filet-o-Fish]

So, I'm a black president?

Of course, couldn't see you in any other light tbh

 

[AfricanScatMahn]

how would people feel about a rule that limits kickouts? I was talking to a few people and they seem to agree that most of the roster can kickout out of 10 finishers or more which kind of makes the other guy look weak. I was thinking a max of 4 finisher kickouts? This would make the game more competitive and to be fair if you already hit 4 finishers while the other person didn't do anything then you kind of deserve the win at that point. This rule would only be in 1v1 matches because it wouldn't really work in big matches. Thoughts?

I agree. We need something in place since the submission rule isn't on place. Cause it's honestly ridiculous guys having 5 to 10 kick outs on each weekly show. When's the last time you saw someone kick out of 5 to 10 finishers ? Plus it makes the other person finisher look really weak... and the other look like a Roman reigns spear.

 

[Chicken McDouble]

it's very unrealistic to kick out of 8 finishers like that. When have we ever seen anyone in a real wrestling match kick out of 7 or more finishers?

The first match that came to mind was Mania 31, Roman vs. Brock. That was like a finisher fest.

 

[AfricanScatMahn]

The first match that came to mind was Mania 31, Roman vs. Brock. That was like a finisher fest.

Still not 7 finishers from the same two people.

 

[Closed]

Kickout Rule

GO

 

[Filet-o-Fish]

None of these arguments would have started if Harambe was still alive.

May he rest in power...

 

[Closed]

get those promos done if you want to be booked for Summerslam. The card will be closed at 10 PM on Thursday.

@Geek773
@Harrison
@ChrisPBacon69

 

[Closed]

anyone know the moves you can't reverse this year? I only remember the Lie Detector but you can reverse that with great luck (A few Xbox guys reversed it) I need to make a list so any help would be great

 

[Geek773]

anyone know the moves you can't reverse this year? I only remember the Lie Detector but you can reverse that with great luck (A few Xbox guys reversed it) I need to make a list so any help would be great

I think maybe Dropkick 13 might be bad but idk whether it's impossible. @impactking thoughts on this?