A few people. I'm going to name people since that's Blue. I even did it to you yesterday in our first match. I played as Seth Rollins (Didn't know the moves) and I ended up with 3 finishers and basically just did second chance reversals. They're OP as they come. I'm sorry if most of you guys don't like it, but two second chance reversals is fair for anyone to have in a match. Save them and be skillful with them.
No they aren't. Presumably you went down reversals and if you won by doing nothing but majors then mistakes were made. They cost double, leave you down later, and *everyone can do them*. I was extremely hyped for this feature coming in because it means you can hit a finisher without knowing it WILL be reversed as soon as they hear that crowd noise. Absolutely no point changing this at all.
There is a point, and I'm going to change it. Why are you defending it so hard? Can you really not deal with two of them? And yes, your reversals build back up in 20 seconds, and the other guy must reverse. You'll be up on them in no time. It's OP.
Their reversals go up too in the same time. Limiting them will cause inconvenience with redone matches for, as far as I can see, no actual benefit.
Look, you can use a second chance reversal and that gives 20 seconds of attacks. In that time your reversals build up and you'll be back to three by the time the other guy reverses. The other guy has to reverse, so how is this fair to spam? Two is enough for anyone....
Again, I'm sorry but I'm not making a vote. I do know for a fact most people will want it there since it's an easy win. I still don't know why two isn't enough for anyone considering doing more than that is a little iffy in my eyes,
I haven't had an easy win for or against me on this game so far. If you know theres a majority then poll it so that we know for sure. If you're right, you're right, but don't claim that you're right and then say that that's all anyone should need to believe you.
I'm not making a vote. I can't be making votes for everything you disagree on. I played hours of online just using this tactic and I lost like 5 times? Keep in mind they were massive guys who ran around with crazy speed. I looked into this more than anyone, and I'm at the point where I can make a rule. Geek, go play 5 hours of just doing that and then we'll make a vote.
You don't need to make a vote for everything when as of now you're the only person who likes this rule. On that basis you could make a rule that matches should be repeated until the GM likes the result and then not allow any loss for you to stand. You wouldn't do that but in terms of people who support the rule, this idea is just as ridiculous.
Playing online cheesers and/or people who suck at the game is different to league matches were certain things can't happen and people are much better at kickouts. I imagine you wouldn't lose very much online regardless because you're very good. Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding your argument but right now the only reason I see for not making a vote is "what I say goes". Which is disrespectful and childish.
8 of the new guys like the rule. They know the thing isn't fair, and I know for a fact they are competitive.....I would say a lot more competitive than most of this league. I probably have the numbers, but I don't need to make a vote.
