Is this some kind of new hindsight fallacy I've never heard of
what is this logic that American citizens automatically know who's bad.
"Trump can't be Hitler bc he was elected"
"Hitler was elected"
"Yes but in hindsight he wouldn't have been"
Am I losing braincells here?
Also dismissing trans issues to "wanting genderless bathroom" would be like the racists that still to this day dismiss the civil rights movement as only being about "water fountains and bus seats". I'm sure this point will be ignored or it will be hand waived away as "not true" despite southern conservatives saying literally that exact line every year around MLK day. "Im privileged and don't interact with racists everyday so they don't exist to me" is so tiring.
Also didn't have time to do any thesaurus editing to sound smarter. Hindsight didn't tell me to
Reading comprehension, please.
Genuinely put aside the hateful bullshit where you immediately have to discredit anyone who has a thought different to yours.
Here's what I said; it is not about the fact that they were elected. It has nothing at all to do with that. It's about what Hitler did. If in hindsight, knowing what we know, knowing the true unfathomable scale of pure EVIL that Hitler was about to unleash. The horrific level of evil he was going to set out upon the World, would you not refuse to hand power over to him and the Nazi's? In hindsight does the fact that Hitler is one of the worst human beings to ever exist, and the Nazi party was pure evil and did not benefit a single human being in any way, shape or form not disqualify them from being granted power?
If you agree with the idea that Hitler should not have been given power (surely we all do, surely no one genuinely believes that because he was voted in that he had to be handed power and allowed to do what he did?), and Trump is supposedly Hitler 2.0, then surely power should not be handed over to him?
I'll ask that again, do we all agree in hindsight that power should never have been handed over to Hitler? That in hindsight we would stop him from being put in a position to do what he did? Or does the idea of democracy trump that and mean that no matter how evil someone is, if they're voted in they have to be allowed in?
Because to me, if Trump is truly Hitler even just to a degree, and is going to swoop in and take away everyone's rights, and all the other shit that the divisionists, and the status quo machine say then power shouldn't be transferred to him. Right? If he is Hitler reborn, why would you let that play out upon the World again? If he is truly as evil as claimed, why would you happily and peacefully hand over power to him?
So to answer your question; yes you are losing brain cells. Because you entirely missed everything I actually wrote and made up your own narrative to suit your agenda. You didn't have the ability to read what is in front of you and comprehend it, you spun it all off into a point that suits your thought processes better.
The point about genderless bathrooms, is that they're the most obvious change, right? They're the thing that would intersect with most peoples day to day life the most. Of course there's more to it than that, there's more layers to it. But genderless bathrooms, identifying as whatever you want, abortions whenever you want are the things that would ring loudest out into the World. Like for example, to use your example; water fountains and bus seats. It was those things, those prevalent in day to day life things that rung out that the World has changed to the people outside of that group of people, outside of African-Americans. Its what people saw. Its what shocked them when it happened. Its those those small things that can ring out.
You're outraged over nothing. You're outraged because you want to be outraged. Because you're trained to be hateful and divisive, you're trained to see nothing but evil in any opinion that doesn't exactly mirror yours.
Honestly, it's hard to really feel bad for Hispanic/Latino voters in this case because they voted overwhelmingly for Trump, who promised that he was going to commit to mass deportation. They made their bed, now they're gonna lie in it when they realized Trump was talking about them.
You know there's a difference between legal and illegal immigration right?
You know that?
Literally no one in the World is calling for the deportation of all immigrants. The closest you'd come is devout Islamic countries operating under the most extremes of Sharia Law. But even they're not calling for deportation of all immigrants.
It's illegal immigrants. Its people who come into the country and don't pay any tax (don't you guys really hate people who don't pay tax?), people who sneak in unvetted.
This is a prime example of why people are so divided thesedays. If someone calls for the deportation of illegal immigrants, the response is to act like they're calling for the deportation of all immigrants.
nah your dog whistles were loud and clear buddy, you can wrap yourself in all the faux intellectualism you want, you're still an asshole
And you can wrap yourself in all the faux intellectualism, faux outrage, and undeserved faux righteousness all you want. You're still the problem here, you still have no reading comprehension skills, you're still a hateful, toxic person who jumps to assumptions you're trained to have rather than reading the words in front of you.
I'll lay my points out with as few words as possible.
1) War mongering is bad, and celebrating war mongers is so wrong.
2) Celebrity worship is stupid, and voting based on who Beyonce tells you to vote for is stupid.
3)There are issues that affect everyone, and issues that affect some people. We need to fix the issues that affect everyone. Fixing those issues benefits everyone.
4) Hitler should never have been given power, and if Trump is Hitler as so many claim, why would you hand power over to him?
