Who says height is the only thing that matters? That's a strawman.Seth Rollins is probably 6 foot 1 to 6 foot 2. Basically you are the same height.
I don't believe everything he says. I think he underrated Goldberg, for example. But he's a credible source for research. The RAW ratings from 1995 was taken from a newspaper article.There is nothing to debunk, you are posting screenshots from a twitter account who is a nobody and you just believe everything he says. Just like the people who think everything Dave Meltzer says is the truth, the so called "smarks", you are the same as the people you hate.
.
You really are dumb aren't you?
Scott Steiner and Ken Shamrock had physical presence. Not because they were tall, but because you knew they would beat the crap out of you.Rollins is an incredibly athlete so he does have physical presence. Unless you only consider physical presence as someone who has a body builder physique
Looking through this thread, I strongly feel people forgot how opinions work... :bill:
Why are you obsessed with Owen Hart?I really appreciate the fact that you used the creepy bill emote, that's very clever.
Why are you obsessed with Owen Hart?
Not really. Braun was a better option. As was Lashley. A Brock vs Lashley match could be great if it was booked properly.Back on topic.
Seth is the best choice if you are looking at storyline. Best storyline you can get.
A Brock vs Lashley match could be great if it was booked properly.
I must be wrong on this occasion then.Wow finally one thing I agree with you.
I make a point about storytelling and you disagree. So instead of talking about a superior story to tell you go back to talking about marketingNot really. Braun was a better option. As was Lashley. A Brock vs Lashley match could be great if it was booked properly.
Really though. There weren't many good options. It's a weak era for marketable talent.