Also Wrestlekingom 13 - was also another Supercard with two headlines matches.
Can't believe I forgot to bring that up earlier
Can't believe I forgot to bring that up earlier
SummerSlam - irrelevant
MITB - irrelevant
Team Johnny vs. Team Teddy - was a draw.
Sheamus vs. Bryan was a draw.
Kelly Kelly - was a massive draw alone..
Also Wrestlekingom 13 - was also another Supercard with two headlines matches.
Can't believe I forgot to bring that up earlier
Wrestlemania 30 had 2 headline matches. Lesnar/Taker and Bryan/HHH, which later turned to Bryan/Orton/Batista.
WM 31 had Sting/HHH and Reigns/Lesnar
WM 33 had Reigns/Taker and Goldberg/Lesnar
WM 25. 5 matches you could argue to be a draw. Michaels/Taker, Cena/Show/Edge, Orton/HHH, Mysterio/JBL, Matt/Jeff. All those matches could be argued to be draws. You could also say Jericho/3 legends was a drawThey are relevant, it shows CM Punk isn’t a draw.
If Punk only bumped a ppv up 30,000 buys in his biggest storyline ever with Cena, then there’s no way he drew for Wrestlemania 28 with Jericho, someone who drew less than Cena.
It’s really that simple lol, you’re basically arguing that Punk contributed 30,000 or less buys of the 1,217,000 buys for Wrestlemania 28.
That’s absolutely laughable, Punk didn’t do anything for Wrestlemania 28 and you
You’ve lost all credibility, Kelly Kelly a massive draw...
Wrestlekingdom is irrelevant in the United States.
I now see the problem, you’re confusing the term supercard for a card where there’s many matches considered great, while when I say supercard I’m talking about a card with multiple mega drawing events.
Most Wrestlemania’s are double main events, I’m talking about a card that had 5 major mainstream events in Wrestlemania 17.
No other show had as many mainstream headlines like 17 did.
WM 25. 5 matches you could argue to be a draw. Michaels/Taker, Cena/Show/Edge, Orton/HHH, Mysterio/JBL, Matt/Jeff. All those matches could be argued to be draws. You could also say Jericho/3 legends was a draw
Like I said he doesn’t think anyone was a draw other than Rock. If it was that bad WWE would’ve gone out of business in 2004.
Only Cena match, and the Mickey Rourke legends match were mega draws for that show
Michaels/Taker, niche loves the work rate but neither were great draws.
Same with Orton/HHH, they were never draws.
Again, proving my point, with Cena, Hogan, Rock or Austin they fail.
Only Cena match, and the Mickey Rourke legends match were mega draws for that show
Michaels/Taker, niche loves the work rate but neither were great draws.
Same with Orton/HHH, they were never draws.
Again, proving my point, with Cena, Hogan, Rock or Austin they fail.
Rock was the last true megastar, Cena the last true draw.
And I don’t even like Cena.
Stop changing the narrative every time you are proven wrong. All 6 matches I listed was draws.
So why are WWE still in business. If every other star was as bad as you say then they should’ve gone under years ago.
where are the numbers that those four didn't draw? numbers?The bottom line is this, Wrestlemania had 5 major headline draws with two of them getting more mainstream press than Rock vs Austin.
Whereas Wrestlemania 18 the only drawing factor is Rock vs Hogan, yet Wrestlemania 18 only drew 180,000 less buys, meaning Rock/Hogan drew more for the Wrestlemania 18 ppv than Rock/Austin did for Wrestlemania 17.
No, the ppv drew 960,000 buys, Taker, HHH, Shawn and Orton didn’t contribute to that number as they were not draws, Cena, Rourke, Mysterio and Hardyz did, as they were draws.
Due to overinflated deals based on draws from the past, take the TV deals and they go out of business.
None of the guys they have are draws.
where are the numbers that those four didn't draw? numbers?
He/She has no numbers,