PULSE's Worst Wrestlers in WWF/E History

[Sabretooth]

I couldn't disagree more but to each his own I guess

Watch Savage vs Warrior at WrestleMania 7 and tell me it was a bad match.

 

[Horrorfan_1986]

I couldn't disagree more but to each his own I guess

Were any of the matches I named bad?

 

[JakeYourBooty]

I was never a fan of Hogan v Warrior and as I said his good matches were with guys that could carry him i.e. Savage & Rude

would like your opinion on the other choices though guys

 

[Wang Chung]

HTM never crossed my mind when making this list but now that I think of it he was pretty bad, and he is a Dick still to this day. I remember hating the guy and every time his music played I wanted to vomit.

Otunga is horrible he is this generations Matt Striker.

Snitsky I forgot about him too the only good thing about him was how horrible his teeth looked I got the feeling he didn't brush much

 

[Sabretooth]

Will you stop the "carrying" shit. You can't carry a wrestler for 27 minutes.

 

[Wang Chung]

I could carry you for 30 and then drop you on your head.


There are people that just happen to make the matches better by being in them period and warrior was not one of them

 

[JakeYourBooty]

Listen your shitty attitude aside my inclusion of Warrior is exactly what LB said his level of talent did not match his push at all.

 

[Horrorfan_1986]

I said his good matches were with guys that could carry him i.e. Savage & Rude

See, you'd think that, but how many other WWE matches did Rick Rude have that were the quality of the Warrior matches? The Roddy Piper matches were awesome, but that's it. Rude's feuds with Paul Orndorff and Jake Roberts both produced a wide variety of shit. As for Savage, he may be great, but how many great matches can you remember from Savage's Macho King days? That WM 7 match is a diamond in the rough for one of Savage's darkest pre-WCW periods. Granted, the Summerslam 1992 match was during a time period when Savage was having a lot of good matches though.

Especially thanks to the rise of the availability of old house shows thanks to 24/7, the more I watch of Warrior, the more he's clearly one of the most underrated guys of our generation. More often than not, when he was given time, he delivered. Yet, people find any excuse to dismiss Warrior.

 

[JakeYourBooty]

But Jim you are a student of wrestling and have watched many many more matches then I have...my only exposure to his matches were the weekly shows, SNME's and the occasional PPV...I have not watched the house shows like you have...but like I said I would like some more input on the other's that were just listed from people...I mean UW isn't the only person from that group that you guys except LB have an opinion on

 

[Horrorfan_1986]

But Jim you are a student of wrestling and have watched many many more matches then I have...my only exposure to his matches were the weekly shows, SNME's and the occasional PPV...I have not watched the house shows like you have

That's part of my argument though. I believe Warrior had a grand total of 1 weekly match that was over 5 minutes long. You can't really have a bad squash match. His SNME matches were a mixed bag with some squashes, some good (Rick Rude) and a couple of bad. Then for PPV matches, I'd say he delivered far more than he failed.

You're the one who voted for Warrior. So there must be some sort of reason that made Warrior stand out against so many of the terrible wrestlers in WWE history, especially since Warrior had plenty of squashes and quality matches.

...but like I said I would like some more input on the other's that were just listed from people...I mean UW isn't the only person from that group that you guys except LB have an opinion on

There's nothing to say though. Akeem, Knobbs and Patera sucked. That's it. That's kind of boring. With Warrior, you have one opinion and I have a very different opinion. The debate is going to draw so much more interest than randomly mentioning that I agree that Crush sucked. Like anywhere else on the net, the topics that create interest due to a variety of opinions are always going to draw more interest.

 

[JakeYourBooty]

before I start the next part I am gonna say there have been a lot I disagree with but this guy being this high up is the shocker for me

17th
Goldust
31pts - [MENTION=157]Mitch Dynomite[/MENTION] 4th, [MENTION=600]-CM-[/MENTION] 7th

Boris Zhukov
31pts - [MENTION=59]Horrorfan_1986[/MENTION] 3rd, [MENTION=51]Fuji Vice[/MENTION] 8th

16th
Zack Gowen
33pts - [MENTION=1]Fuje Vise[/MENTION] 8th, [MENTION=208]Enforcer[/MENTION] 1st

Eugene
33pts - Brando 3rd, -CM- 6th

15th
Heidenreich
HF86 11th, Brando 10th, [MENTION=60]The Linebacker[/MENTION] 6th

14th
Zeus
35pts - Booty 2nd, [MENTION=121]Porkchop Express[/MENTION] 5th

​

 

[JakeYourBooty]

That's part of my argument though. I believe Warrior had a grand total of 1 weekly match that was over 5 minutes long. You can't really have a bad squash match. His SNME matches were a mixed bag with some squashes, some good (Rick Rude) and a couple of bad. Then for PPV matches, I'd say he delivered far more than he failed.

You're the one who voted for Warrior. So there must be some sort of reason that made Warrior stand out against so many of the terrible wrestlers in WWE history, especially since Warrior had plenty of squashes and quality matches.



There's nothing to say though. Akeem, Knobbs and Patera sucked. That's it. That's kind of boring. With Warrior, you have one opinion and I have a very different opinion. The debate is going to draw so much more interest than randomly mentioning that I agree that Crush sucked. Like anywhere else on the net, the topics that create interest due to a variety of opinions are always going to draw more interest.

We keep going round and round though, do you really feel that his level of talent in ring warranted him the level of success he got as quickly as he got it? Like I said this list is also depended on the amount of success a limited in ring performer had. Clearly I don't have the chops to give you the concrete evidence you crave because as we have discussed many I am not one to debate because I feel how I feel and really am not the skilled debater that can put my feelings into words. Does that make me boring or my points invalid? Probably but I can live with it.

 

[Postman Dave]

goddamn, completely forgot about Gowen's push in 2003. Should have been on my list.

Eugene had a shit gimmick, but played the character well. Goldust wasn't great early on in WWE, but really picked it up as time went on.

Heidenreich was fucking awful. Didn't even have the wacky charisma of Snitsky or Kozlov to save him.

 

[Sabretooth]

Oh come on why the hate on Eugene? I thought he played it to perfection.

Goldust became a good wrestler as time went on.

I can't judge Boris Zhukov.

Zeus was god awful.

Heidenreich was ok but I can see his inclusion.


Zack Gowen has one freakin leg. Why should he be on this list?

 

[JakeYourBooty]

Zack Gowen was teh best one legged wrestler ever....and that is how he got his huge push...which is no way to get a push

Eugene was never bad in the ring he was just playing his awful gimmick up

Goldust come on....no way man

Boris was so bad that the only things I remember him for are his Giant head and their loss to the Hart Foundation in 30 seconds or less at Wrestlemania

Heidenreich was awful then they made him a member of LOD pissing all over Hawk's grave

Zeus was an actor that they pushed to promote their movie...he was worse in the ring as most of the superstars are on WWE films... but they used him for way longer then they should have just to promote the movie it was really really bad...he was much better in Friday