No More Happy Endings - Once Upon a Time Mafia Game Thread

[John McHenry]

Why Ekko easiest? You think he's lying about his activity and motivation? You think that should be the scummiest thing so far?

I think it's the easiest d1. You've played with him far more than I have is this typical of him?

 

[Sister Abigail]

Like who even put that fucking James Harden emoji on here.

 

[Sister Abigail]

Would or wouldn't lol

Haha wouldn't. Though blind firing D1 could be fun. But I would usually recommend against not doing that.

 

[Sister Abigail]

I certainly didn't mean to infer you we're solely at fault either, takes two to tango and things were getting pretty bad for a lot of reasons.

No offense taken.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Seems a bit TOO well thought out maybe for just the inactives. Don't get too twitchy yet, Jeff, lots of game left to play.

meh, maybe. I felt it required further explanation as I would expect people to ask me "well why not these other guys who have also dipped?". I mean, I would ask me that question

 

[Wangman Page]

I agree that I can be mega aggressive, but there's lots of games where that doesn't come out. I also am more aggressive on this forum than others where maybe it's a different atmosphere or I have more familiarity elsewhere. Every game I've played here since I've been back my aggression levels have been questioned. On other forums, I got sussed for being too friendly and nice. I think there's a lot of different sides to me and how I play depending on the factors.

Yeah I believe that can go for anyone. Pretty sure everyone in here has had a fued at one point if they have played the game long enough. It happens.



Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

 

[Sister Abigail]

I think it's the easiest d1. You've played with him far more than I have is this typical of him?

Well, I don't want to angle shoot, but I know for a fact Ekko did not want to play in this game (don't think he even wanted to sub). Ekko will also always be active no matter what alignment, so if he says he isn't interested in playing, I buy that as there truth. So yeah, I don't love how you say Ekko is the easiest lynch and someone you'd be fine voting for. You can see how that thought process might make me look at you funny, yeah?

 

[John McHenry]

Yeah I believe that can go for anyone. Pretty sure everyone in here has had a fued at one point if they have played the game long enough. It happens.



Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

Don't think Tommy or I have maybe we'll get it out of the way this game and go at each other lol

 

[Wangman Page]

I think it's the easiest d1. You've played with him far more than I have is this typical of him?

Based on him not getting involved and it's a safe lynch or are you saying because he played down his role last game and played less to start off?

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

 

[Sister Abigail]

meh, maybe. I felt it required further explanation as I would expect people to ask me "well why not these other guys who have also dipped?". I mean, I would ask me that question

Jeff knowing that town Jeff would ask wolf Jeff certain questions is BOOM.

 

[John McHenry]

Well, I don't want to angle shoot, but I know for a fact Ekko did not want to play in this game (don't think he even wanted to sub). Ekko will also always be active no matter what alignment, so if he says he isn't interested in playing, I buy that as there truth. So yeah, I don't love how you say Ekko is the easiest lynch and someone you'd be fine voting for. You can see how that thought process might make me look at you funny, yeah?

I see where you're coming from. But he had two games where he took up multiple pages saying modkills so strikes me odd he's just going to dip. And on d1 when everyone is a crap shoot seems warranted to at least address it.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

yeah like I'll be real, the though crossed my mind that ekko could be leveraging his lacking of wanting to play (which is likely factual, why would it not be) into a convenient shield for inactivity. I just didn't really feel it warranted being brought up because what is even the point of laying out that sus when he has like 2 posts.

I do think it was shocking he offered to claim when we needed him too though , he really must not wanna play

 

[Bobby Barrows]

Haha wouldn't. Though blind firing D1 could be fun. But I would usually recommend against not doing that.

Hahaha well at least we're in agreement.

If I could segue back btw to what I meant by usually taking Juice's posts at face value, what I tend to mean is, in my opinion, she has a tendency to be honest as either alignment, which is why asking for further clarification or deep diving her posts usually doesn't yield many results. She is easily caught out on usage and information though and that's when I recommend pouncing on her. She will defend herself adamantly and with reckless abandon otherwise.

She also has a tendency to be a lone wolf as scum. It's better overall to just wait for her to claim some usage or role rather than comb through her posts because they'll always be a mess as either alignment.

This has honestly been my entire experience with her. Feel free to push her for a claim though, that I'm not gonna really dissuade people from anymore.

 

[John McHenry]

Based on him not getting involved and it's a safe lynch or are you saying because he played down his role last game and played less to start off?

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

The combo honestly

 

[Wangman Page]

Don't think Tommy or I have maybe we'll get it out of the way this game and go at each other lol

They happen and can get heated. I was so upset in a game and my wife was sitting there and she yelled at me for giving her attitude because I was frustrated with the game.

We all have them to some extent. It's how you bounce back and play afterwards. Nothing needs to continue after a game.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk