My first vote in this game will be a random vote. And it will be the person who has the 3rd most amount of posts at 4:30PM.
Well this can be NAI in a vacuum, I don't like how Juice didn't really have much posting from this to following through on this.
Random voting stage over.
Unvote
Activating Detective Mode: 10% Brain Usage Confirmed
Theory a) Part of this disagreement has been orchestrated by the mafia to argue amongst each other
Theory b) Lethal want to be a vote magnet and attract votes - and therefore might be the Jester
Theory c) Everyone town and this is just day one nothingness
I also don't find this particularly pingy, but Juice also used this to help fuel a couple of her posts as well.
I'm confused. Is it not agreed by all - that Sky's vote was a random vote and nothing more?
Not sure why this post is necessary.
Those were just basic theories to analyze what I had read. Nothing I would commit an actual hard vote to. I suppose A & B would work on the basis that Lethal is scum though - that is a good point. But I can't tell the difference between annoyed Lethal irrespective of his alignment.
I dislike how two of three theories that Juice but forward themselves can somehow be argued that Lethal could be scum. Seems like three arbitrary theories Juice made up but now is using to throw some suss on Lethal's name.
Until Lethal actually posts again - I don't think I can really push either of the three soft theories. I don't think it help when in the original Jeff vs. Lethal exchange - both feel aggrieved and both feel the other was the instigator. My viewpoint on the situation will be looked at again - once I see more content.
Not really sure why you really used to as a talking point then? You literally say 2/3 of your theories can work with Lethal being scum but then don't ask him anything or pursue it, instead just dropping it. Also don't like how you say your viewpoint on the argument will be looked at again with more content. That sounds like you could be waiting for Jeff and Lethal to do something and then connect it back to their argument, which I think is largely NAI.
Also Day 1 lasts 54 hours - so until the activity of someone of the most quiet players pick up - I don't think looking for scum out of the nosiest or most active is always wise. I do however think, at least one person who has last posts than Smark with 100% flip mafia:
CK, John Henry, Shade, Baldrick, Wang, Phenom or Pendex
I mean, again, NAI in a vacuum, I suppose, but now a pattern is starting to emerge. I don't really feel like any of these theories Juice offers up really helps propel town forward.
He has made zero posts. So isn't included in my assumption theory.
I always think there is a big difference between a low number of posts and no posts at all.
The Ekko stuff now that does take up some posts by Juice.
The problem here - is people are asking me to define or explain what I haven't said in my post. Which at a basis level doesn't make sense.
Didn't like being called out for omitting Ekko.
I mean I don't have a photographic memory - and unless you think this is a major slip. Rather than just a player looking to get the game moving, then I don't know what to say lol.
A bit aggressive here.
It is my d) theory at the moment for sure.
But I have no knowledge of who is actually mafia - so everything is a potential at this point in time.
The secret path of the D! ;p
You scum read me? I find that mildly funny.
Why is it funny?
What im more confused about - is my magnificent seven questions has generated more questions about something: I didn't say - and why I didn't say it. As if I made a mistake.
As in you didn't say anything about Ekko?
Sky - I'm curious why exactly I am you're main scum read?
Another question about suss.
I didn't shade people with low posts. I just made a potential observation.
I agree it wasn't shade, but you should know how easy it is to just point at the low posters and say go there. People literally say that every game. It's not like you added anything ground breaking to the game by making a potential observation.
So I am you're main scum focus - for trying to create topic that will lead to scum hunting? Smh lol.
I mean, I guess I admire the confidence that your posts will lead to scum hunting.
my only read is that T-Pein is up to some sort of nonsense. The rest of the game is filled with people making assumptions about what someone said or questioning why people didn't say something - rather than what they actually said.
Yet out of all these posts that are supposed to lead to scum hunting, Juice only has a single read. Hm.
Overall, I don't think Juice has been as scum hunty as they say. I while the things Juice has said can be seen as NAI individually, I don't really think they've been the scum hunting help that Juice makes them out to be. There hasn't been any reads, pushes, points against, just Juice throwing out theories. Juice goes into the wolf pile for me here.
