Mr. Robot Mafia: Game Thread

[Chris]

Excellent. Can you run me down as to why Alco is your main suspect please.

His original read back quotes were unspectacular but I don't hold that against anyone too high on D1. However, he didn't comment on me whatsoever during it except to agree with me that OMB shouldn't be excluded from questioning just bc his answers might not make sense. But then he drops a 6th vote on me after I had asked for people voting for me to give me reasons before I claimed since I had seen minimal. And he had no actual reasons other than "following my good friend Jeff."

Then once again he votes CP to "follow Jeff" except you straight up said you were following Odo on that wagon.

 

[Odo]

Jeff I need a favour

are there any wagons you e voted on today that Alco hasn’t followed you on?

 

[Chris]

I think it's odd that he mentioned following you both times as well, Jeff when Odo was a big part of both wagons too even if he didn't start the one on me.

 

[Comrade Khan]

*sigh* making me work while i'm at my laziest, I will check, one sec.

 

[Comrade Khan]

Chris, what you are saying tracks exactly with what you said this morning. so consistency is a point in your favor i am willing to yield.

 

[Comrade Khan]

I'm fairly certain I have only voted 3 people. and alco is certainly not going to vote himself. the answer is yes @Odo he did follow me on both Chris and CP.

 

[Comrade Khan]

Sorry if I already got an answer but did sky also full claim with her VT claim?

 

[Chris]

Edward Alderson. For what it's worth I'm town and affiliation is E Corp, just for those people who were talking about alignment flavour spec

Flavour is basically that I sucked at being a dad and died

@Jeffatron

 

[Odo]

@Big Man could we get an up to date vote count please?

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Yeah that's right, sit on that fence. "I think this person is scum, but I like the argument on why they're town"

You use the word fence-sitting but I don't think you know what it means.

I took a position, I believe you're scum. Odo makes a very good argument that contesting would lead me in the wrong, because I know for a fact it's a good argument.

If you debate every single point without any thought into it, then you're going to look like an idiot. Pick and choose when to contest and when to concede. If a person makes a point you feel you can reasonably argue against, you contest. If a person makes a point that you agree with, even on opposite sides, you concede.

It's basic fucking debate, Sky.

 

[Tweet]

I'm missing why the bolded is a reason to go from Alco to Mitch though. If you already prefer Alco to CP then Alco/Mitch should be the choice and you switched without (afaict) new info between the bolded point and the previous paragraph.

I could have also went back to Alco but decided to go for Mitch instead, I won't even pretend that there's a reason I picked one over the other.

 

[Tweet]

I mean why does it even matter that I voted Mitch over going back to Alco, what is the conclusion people wanna draw from me making that move?

 

[Chris]

I could have also went back to Alco but decided to go for Mitch instead, I won't even pretend that there's a reason I picked one over the other.

no he's saying you already switched back to Alco from CP when I made my post wondering why he said he was following Jeff on CP's wagon when Jeff was following Odo. THEN you switched to Mitch. So you went Alco, CP, Alco, then Mitch and the second Alco vote switching to Mitch is what he's questioning.

 

[Odo]

I mean why does it even matter that I voted Mitch over going back to Alco, what is the conclusion people wanna draw from me making that move?

the argument is that you put your metaphorical fingerin the air and felt the wind blowing to mitch, and got in on the ground floor

I assume

 

[Leon TrotSky]

skybox your opinion on this statement please

It is indeed disappointing that the wagon has resolved with nothing to show for it other than CP making a few posts