Because the consensus was pretty clear on flay. I made a post saying why ace wasn't the go. No benefit to it as opposed to just waiting for him to at least have to give a fake split which would be mostly accurate
Why do you keep bringing up Ace as a reason for not voting Flay? I did not want to lynch Ace.
You don't think an extra vote from yourself wouldn't have been able to swing at least 1-2 more votes onto Flay and ideally lynching him as opposed to doing nothing?
I think it's weird that you'd be happy to vote Poyser for a claim to push for more votes and if it ended up as a lynch, you'd unvote and hammer to get the benefit of your caveat but you wouldn't do the same for Flay when it was in your interest to try and get a lynch for you to hammer on.
So instead, you kept your vote on Poyser, made a post to look good around not lynching Ace and went against your early posts of "pls let me hammer" to ensure town went to no-lynch.