Impact Wrestling Discussion - May 24th, 2012 - Open Fight Night II

[Fuji Vice]

I explained it in other posts. Why do I have to say it in every post

If you have to ask that question, you're dumber than I thought.

Just shut up about it already, ffs.

 

[Shane]

How does TNA decide who makes the challenge

 

[Fuji Vice]

Damn. I don't like Gunner losing, but that was a monster frog splash!

 

[Ricky Smarks]

That may be the longest 5-Star I've ever seen.

 

[Hoss]

I explained it in other posts. Why do I have to say it in every post

Because otherwise it's just spam/filler, which we don't want and we don't need. I don't see a reason to argue this point, he was just warning you and you're not going to convince him to retract his warning. Just accept that he doesn't want you to make posts like that anymore and move on, please.

I mean look here, RVD wins baby! We all love RVD, right?

 

[Shane]

If you have to ask that question, you're dumber than I thought.

Just shut up about it already, ffs.

No because it's not fair. If in one post I don't write an explanation it's like a fucking crime. I explained why in five other posts. My "fuck you tna" post was a conclusion

 

[Castiel]

RVD going to the far corner instead of the one right next to Gunner was pretty sweet, that leap was huge!

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Because it's hilarious and the titles don't mean anything anyway. If Kim holds the title, they won't be exposed at all. It'll be all about the KO title

While a man holds it, of course it won't mean anything. I honestly don't care if it's secondary as long as a top notch KO is holding them.

 

[Shane]

That 5-star was fucking insane. RVD may be in the twilight of his career but he's still fucking awesome.

 

[Castiel]

No because it's not fair. If in one post I don't write an explanation it's like a fucking crime. I explained why in five other posts. My "fuck you tna" post was a conclusion

Jesus dude, you act like you always explain and NEVER post just "Fuck you ___" you do it A LOT. Just stop and let's move on please. Let's try and enjoy this, I'm really digging this episode.

 

[Fuji Vice]

No because it's not fair. If in one post I don't write an explanation it's like a fucking crime. I explained why in five other posts. My "fuck you tna" post was a conclusion

Ugh, never mind, you're not getting my point.

I'd really like some confirmation on whether the titles changed hands in that KO's match.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Because otherwise it's just spam/filler, which we don't want and we don't need. I don't see a reason to argue this point, he was just warning you and you're not going to convince him to retract his warning. Just accept that he doesn't want you to make posts like that anymore and move on, please.

I mean look here, Gunner should have won, baby! We all love Gunner, right?

Fixed for the truth.

 

[Shane]

While a man holds it, of course it won't mean anything. I honestly don't care if it's secondary as long as a top notch KO is holding them.

if she wasn't the KO champ that's fine but the titles won't be defended because she's already the KO champ

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Ugh, never mind, you're not getting my point.

I'd really like some confirmation on whether the titles changed hands in that KO's match.

I would too but TBH I think it was non-title which greatly disappoints me. Hemme didn't mention it nor did Kim/Madison leave with the straps.

 

[Fuji Vice]

Alright, I've confirmed that the KO's Tag Titles were not on the line in that match.

This begs the obvious question...why the fuck not?