I want to ask a legitimate question. If say Daniel Bryan weren't to return at all, who would you have win it then? Give me an honest answer.
And Stop, he's still getting loud pops. I don't know why you're making excuses why he shouldn't be? If I linked a Smackdown video, the response would be edited. If you linked a video of a small pop, I'd say they're in a bad crowd like Green Bay. So putting crowd reactions to the side, when Sheamus went to RAW there was about a two month gap of winning the WWE Championship. Now THAT'S a fast push!
I think people want to hate Reigns for the sake of him being a big muscular guy with the look, so he automatically doesn't deserve a push. But no one is going to complain about a Seth Rollins push by turning his back on The Shield, siding with HHH, winning MITB and having feuds with Orton, Cena and Lesnar because he's from talentland, ROH. Or how no one is going to complain about Ambrose getting segments, movies and feuds with The Authority, Rollins, Orton and Bray Wyatt.
BUT... we will complain about a Roman Reigns who has been improving and learning for the last six months, taking acting classes, having a three minute promos, repairing from injury because he has the "look" that WWE wants and hasn't been able to find in a decade. Who has he been feuding with? Orton and Big Show? Who's been writing his promos? Vince McMahon? If Roman were to say get to a point where he's developed enough to become champion, how much more can he improve on when he becomes Champion?
Ambrose is improving, Rollins is improving and Reigns is improving. So leaving one man out based out based off his limited talent or lets say, reaction level is ridiculous. It only gets better from here for all three of them. AND unlike Sheamus, Reigns speaks English.