General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Bobby Barrows]

I think the biggest issue is that there's not a whole lot of investors (outside of Billy Corgan in 1999) who were really interested in buying into a hardcore promotion because very few mainstream media moguls would want that on their product. If FOX, the anti-authority channel of the 90s was anti-wrestling, ECW had little chance.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

that was the draw

You know it. This is why I find it wild no one asked him to run their developmental.

 

[Death By Looch]

The great thing about Heyman is he didn’t necessarily need stars because he was the one guy that could literally make a star out of the guys that no one else wanted.

Makes it so sad that he wasn't in charge creatively in WWE throughout the 2010s

 

[Canadian Dragon]

ive said it a million times but thats the one guy id throw all my money at lol

 

[Canadian Dragon]

but hes prob too late and comfy in his career to jump

 

[Canadian Dragon]

above any talent tho that would be the biggest get

 

[Death By Looch]

Bigger than Vince?

 

[Death By Looch]

 

[Bobby Barrows]

I think if I were Heyman in the 1990s, I'd have definitely shifted my product into less hardcore and more technical/cruiserweight wrestling, and keep the anti-authority ideas.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

Bigger than Vince?

Vince sucks lmfao

 

[Butters]

vince is the best promoter to ever live

 

[Bobby Barrows]

McMahon especially sucks as a booker. He only got by for so long because he had the soothsayer and probably the most underrated creative booker Pat Patterson with him.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

TK listens to njpw mark Danielson and business instantly up, hope he noticed

 

[Bobby Barrows]

But yeah, would be an interesting TEW scenario, swapping owners around.

 

[Deezy]

Hiring the best booker is what makes Vince the best you bum ass.