General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Grim]

Tell you what.

 

[Butters]

tell me

 

[Grim]

Bischoff was a bad booker who had too much money and too many stars. Paul Heyman was a great booker with not enough money and not enough stars.

 

[Samoa Looch]

Now imagine they have traded places in some other universe

 

[Grim]

Now imagine they have traded places in some other universe

ECW would have died in 1995.

 

[Comrade Khan]

By having Hogan and Nash be egotistical fucks and not want to job to him.

manage talent better ig

 

[Comrade Khan]

Bischoff was a bad booker who had too much money and too many stars. Paul Heyman was a great booker with not enough money and not enough stars.

 

[Grim]

Actually now that I'm thinking about it, if Bischoff owned ECW, it probably wouldn't have had money problems, he likely would have gotten some sort of investors involved and a better TV deal.

 

[Grim]

The product would have looked like even worse ass tho.

 

[Grim]

People forget, Bischoff came from the Verne Gagne camp of booking.

 

[Grim]

Would certainly be an interesting thought exercise if Heyman ran WCW and Bischoff ECW.

 

[Grim]

But I fear that Heyman would have probably run WCW worse than Bischoff did by the end. Bischoff was a much better businessman than Heyman was, but Heyman was miles ahead as a booker.

 

[Samoa Looch]

I don't think we would've gotten Hogan in WCW... maybe I remember it wrong, but Bischoff was a huge part of that signing, right?

 

[Grim]

I don't think we would've gotten Hogan in WCW... maybe I remember it wrong, but Bischoff was a huge part of that signing, right?

Bischoff had to convince Turner to buy Hogan's contract, not WCW itself.

 

[Samoa Looch]

But I fear that Heyman would have probably run WCW worse than Bischoff did by the end. Bischoff was a much better businessman than Heyman was, but Heyman was miles ahead as a booker.

The two fused together with their good traits in tact probably would be something else