Okay PSYCH, just answer me these simple questions please. Don't go off on about ratings or business sense, don't name drop aload of cable networks, don't mention past superstars or past reigns.
- How on gods green earth is it Punk's fault he has no legitimate contenders to his belt? Is it his fault that guys from yesteryear are no longer around to give him credible feuds? (A simple yes or no here should suffice.)
- You seem to think sticking the title on Cena so he can make a new star is the answer to this supposed problem. Tell me, who in your opinion did Cena last make?
- If he is that good at making them and it's supposedly so easy for him to do so, why has not done so for what seems like the longest of time? Obviously The Rock feud is an exception, but surely you can see that him feuding with Kane & Big Show does nothing for either guy and is a huge waste as those guys are already made and don't need John Cena in any shape or fashion. If people pay the tickets to see Cena regardless of who is facing and he'll continue to draw ratings, why has he not elevated Alberto or Dolph or any other guy of that ilk? Instead we're left treading water with another year that's passed us by with no new legit guys being made and the older guard getting a year older.
- John Cena beats Punk and holds the title for a few months as they both battle it for the title in a series of matches in which Punk eventually wins and supposedly makes him legit in your words. Personally I don't see how this helps because once again Punk, his challengers & the WWE title will take a back seat to all Cena's feuds and everything will come off second best just like it appears now. I don't see how this in any progress at all.