Though I would love to keep toying with you and let you continue to make a fool out of yourself, since it's the holidays I'll be generous.
I was not referring to whether you like or dislike the director. I really couldn't care less how you waste your life in front of a television screen.
I was referring to your dimwitted assertion that his movies strive for an "indy" ambiance. The fact his movies are always casted with the likes of Samuel L. Jackson, Brad Pitt, John Travolta, Bruce Willis, Uma Thurman, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Kurt Russel, Rose McGowan, and Michael Madsen (basically a fuck ton of the biggest actors in Hollywood) automatically dismisses your idiotic claim. And if you still don't understand, try indexing the budget his movies typically work with to accomplish the mass amounts of violence, particularly Kill Bill... tens of millions of dollars, far beyond the capabilities of any indy film.
There are only two possibilities your post conveys, either that you haven't watched Tarantino's movies (besides the one about OMG NAZIS) or you've never watched an indy film, but you want us to believe you have because maybe it will fool us into thinking "wow this guy really knows his shit!". Or both. However it's clear you don't understand the comparison you just made, blatantly demonstrated by your abominable description of his movies. I've heard many criticisms of Tarantino's style, most of which revolved around them being the complete polar opposite of how you described them and that they're too violent. I suggest before you compare two things next time, you should really know something about BOTH items. Or either.