He thought it was an easy lynched based on his read from what I remember, nothing personal wise.
nah he had no read on me. he entered the thread with a vote on me and an unwarranted defense/pocket of magic. by his own admission he said the wagon is partly due to bias and that he doesnt care to continue it. there is no way hes able to tell if magic is town or not at the time so him trying to use that as an argument to start a wagon on me is in itself is ingenuine. like he tried to say i am scum because i was voting magic early on without analyzing reasons behind my vote.
when asked why he read magic as town he was unable to answer. when asked why he thinks my posts are scummy he was unable to answer. when asked for his reason for not beliving that my thought process is genuine. he was also unable to answer. he failed to establish and keep a simple prolonged interaction with a player that he scum reads. this in itself tells u that his read is ingenuine.
this is solely a problem on his end. he got himself to a point that he knows is wrong but his ego is preventing him from backing out so whatever happens forward if he is town is on him.
Very odd that you chose to focus on an obvious over exaggeration of the point rather than actually address the point that you called for scum to shoot jeff. That's very odd indeed.
there is nothing to address. u didnt call my posts odd u just asked why "half" of them are about telling mafia to shoot jeff which is obviously untrue, and here u admit that it was an exaggeration so whats my response supposed to be here?
my posts arent odd i said multiple times jeff is mafia to me. in the 1% chance that he is town then i hope mafia shoots him. whats odd about that exactly? break it down for me like im 5
Why are you acting like I've said give her a pass or something, rather than me saying I'm inclined to believe it for logical reasons?
hence "soft" defense