Blood in the WWE.

[Jose Tortilla]

HHH and Taker were "fined". We all know they weren't.

Lol true, they can't be..

And btw, Brock ain't human..ity:

 

[Rysenberg]

It won't do any serious damage if they get their hands up to block the blow abit but when they take direct shots to the head like this :

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejpBMwSQxm8[/yt]

They can cause serious concussion issues, which is never a good thing. It could be one bad shot which messes them up especially when your bumping flat on your back you can bang the back of your head on the mat or anything. I wouldn't mind experienced guys like Taker and HHH doing them rarely but like I think I can speak for everyone when I say we need to avoid another Benoit incident.

That shot is brutal! I never realised chair were that strong, suppose they manage to hold Chimel every week though so they must be.

Yeah, Triple H and Undertaker should be allowed to do them at 'Mania but I suppose it isn't worth potential injury for the sake of a little detail.

 

[SpaceR]

I like blood in the WWE but I like to see it every once in a while. Matches like Cena vs Rock only deserve Rock. Only heated, great feuds should include blood.

 

[Jose Tortilla]

True thing, I saw an old RAW match between Batista and Muhammad Hassan tonight, and Batista was so 'angry'.
Hassan and his manager Daivari were both busted wide open..

That's maybe too much, maybe keep it at PPV's.

 

[Crayo]

That shot is brutal! I never realised chair were that strong, suppose they manage to hold Chimel every week though so they must be.

Yeah just seen that vid too, I don't remember it for some reason, but my god that looked like it hurt. Matt's shot after looked equally painful.

 

[Goldberg]

I didn't bleed too much when I was in the WWE. I think adding the blood would make feuds/matches a little more intense. I agree with possibly having Triple H or Undertaker bleed during their match. It would make you really believe they put there all into the match.

 

[Sackfist]

The match last year could have been better with blood, I agree @[Goldberg], this year needs to have some.

 

[seabs]

It's about the only way to salvage it tbh. Taker is very limited and Hunter is slowing down.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

It's about the only way to salvage it tbh. Taker is very limited and Hunter is slowing down.

You're not a fan of guys exchanging/kicking out of one anothers finishers for 25 minutes with a couple of extra spots thrown in?

Their match last year was a 5 star classic I say!

 

[Crayo]

You're not a fan of guys exchanging/kicking out of one anothers finishers for 25 minutes with a couple of extra spots thrown in?

Their match last year was a 5 star classic I say!

So overrated. It was average.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

So overrated. It was average.

The first few minutes was good on the outside, but after that it was downright boring. Both guys were gassed.

 

[Crayo]

The first few minutes was good on the outside, but after that it was downright boring. Both guys were gassed.

Exactly. I wouldn't call it a 5 star classic, three quarters of the match Taker or HHH were just on the floor while the other guy stumbled around.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I was mocking the idiots who loved that match by calling it a 5 star classic. I remember reading forums the day after Mania last year and marks were flaming the shit out of me for not loving the match

 

[Crayo]

I was mocking the idiots who loved that match by calling it a 5 star classic. I remember reading forums the day after Mania last year and marks were flaming the shit out of me for not loving the match

Oh wow my bad - went completely over my head lmao.

Thank god you see the light. WWE.com rated that as the best match that year, the same year as Randy vs Christian and Cena vs Punk. We all know HHH demanded to be at the top.

 

[Jose Tortilla]

I guess 'best match' stands for most watched, biggest money and biggest names..