C4
Guest
There's alot more evidence that points to it being legit, than all the aimless theories that say it's not legit. The thing is, there's all these different theories, but none of them connect, and none of them join together to make a convincing argument. They're all just a bunch of random observations, that dont really prove anything.
I'd really love to hear that evidence.
And how do you know they're not correct? Of course they're going to be random observations because nobody knows what exactly happened that day. And your so called 'evidence' doesn't prove anything either it's the same as those aimless theories that say it's not legit.
By the way, what is that 'evidence'?