Neither was secession
Therefore Secession was not a protected clause of the United States and never was before the Civil War
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
The Russo-Ukrainian War Thread (FKA Political Thread)
- Thread starter Bobby Barrows
- Start date
Therefore Secession was not a protected clause of the United States and never was before the Civil War
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
so dislike towards abortion and gay marriage - is based solely on it not being the constitution?
They shouldn't be reviewing any issues that are not in the Constitution. If you can think of a relevant example give it to me. Searching a car? That falls under the 4th Amendment. Same with unlawful detainment. Issues such as that is what they should rule on. Not some vague interpretation of something that is not even mentioned in the document.
Like they are trying to strip an ACTUAL Constitutional Right in the 2nd Amendment?
There is no right to an abortion. There is no Federal law against it either.
Not necessarily. But it is definitely why it should have never been made legal in the way it was. At least if it was done the right way I wouldn't really have an argument would I? Other than I don't agree.
If it was done the right way to begin with we wouldn't be having the conversation now.
It was not mentioned either way in the Constitution. So with my argument, the Supreme Court had no say in it. Thanks for proving me right.Neither was secession
Therefore Secession was not a protected clause of the United States and never was before the Civil War
So then the Confederate States were still in the wrong, thanks for finally admitting to it after all these years.
And even if you want to argue that, it's a pretty piss-poor argument to make, you defend something that wasn't in the constitution one second but when another thing is being argued against, you're totally against it?
No. There was no law against it. There was no mention of it in the Constitution. Therefore they could not have been in the wrong.
It was completely legal for them to do so.
It was a State's Right issue. They chose to no longer be affiliated with the U.S. and created their own sovereign nation.
I honestly don’t care if it’s in the constitution or not. No one has the right to tell a woman she has to give birth. It’s going to get messy. Surely in the places I mentioned that have ZERO expectations. Women are going to have to die, just so a baby can be born. Is that right?