WWE TV Deals Shopped Together For First Time Ever

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
If USA Network wants to retain its biggest hit, “Monday Night Raw,” it’s gonna have to pay.

Next month, for the first time, WWE will shop the rights to “Raw” and all of its shows at the same time — a list of weekly series that includes Syfy’s “Friday Night SmackDown,” “Main Event” on ION Television, the CW’s “Saturday Morning Slam” and reality show “Total Divas” on E!

The goal is to significantly increase the $139.5 million in TV licensing fees WWE earns each year for its shows, and attempt to get closer to the rich network deals that sports organizations like the NBA, NHL NASCAR, as well as soccer command.

In the past, deals for WWE’s series were brokered individually on a staggered timeline, usually every three to four years or so. But WWE has spent nearly two years quietly lining up rights to expire simultaneously in an effort to secure higher fees and appease shareholders who have grown increasingly frustrated that the company’s TV deals are not worth more at a time when live “event” programming is more valuable than ever.

By offering up all its shows at once, “We’re letting the marketplace determine if it’s interested in all or pieces,” says Michelle Wilson, WWE’s chief revenue and marketing officer. The company also is tackling a self-inflicted perception problem. For years, it’s touted its over-the-top characters and soap opera storylines ahead of the live aspect of the year-round action in the ring.

“We’ve had to evolve our thinking,” Wilson says. “We are clearly entertainment-based, but if you think about the characteristics of our brand, it’s live action, and that’s sports. We want to be compensated for a live audience, since live content is getting a very significant premium in the marketplace.”

The company cites Nascar’s impressive dealmaking this summer as an example. The racing league secured a new 10-year deal with NBC and Fox worth $820 million a year. And that increase came in the face of declining ratings for many of its races. WWE argues that “Raw” and “SmackDown” alone are just as attractive, with a rabid fanbase that’s helped build networks, and its series are diverse in ethnicity and age.

Combined, the shows air 156 episodes a year that average a 2.2 household rating. Nascar airs 154 races and averages a 1.38 household rating among viewers, who are 92% white and over 50. WWE’s audience is far more diverse and broken out fairly evenly among age groups. A selling point is that 44% of them are under 34.

That’s helped boost gross ratings points, something Madison Avenue keeps a close eye on. Another plus for WWE: 90% of “Raw’s” and “SmackDown’s” viewers watch the shows live or within the next day, making the shows DVR proof. (Think NBC’s latest stunt with “The Sound of Music”.)

“The value of live content has gone from becoming important to essential,” says George Barrios, WWE’s chief strategy and financial officer. “As a network, if you don’t have live must-see content your existence comes into question.”

To make its show more attractive, WWE is considering a live version of its two-hour “SmackDown,” which currently is taped on Tuesday before its Friday airing. To do that, costs to produce the series would increase, due to scheduling, and the show would likely need to move to a new night. But WWE would be willing to make the switch in return for a better fee for the series.

WWE added a third hour to “Raw” last year (starting with its 1,000th episode) in an effort to expand storylines, increase exposure for its stars, but also enable USA to generate more advertising revenue after three-hour specials performed well.

The Stamford, Conn.-based company ideally would like to partner with a conglomerate that owns a variety of channels the way NBCU currently airs many of WWE’s shows. Along with “Raw,” “SmackDown” and “Total Divas,” specials like “Tribute to the Troops” and a shortened version of its annual “WrestleMania” pay-per-view also air on NBC. WWE already has reached out to or held meetings with the expected list of players who own a variety of channels hungry for programming, including A&E, Disney, Viacom, 21st Century Fox and Discovery.

Negotiations and bids can’t take place until Feb. 15, when NBCU accepts or rejects WWE’s final offer; other bids are due Feb. 28, with WWE set to select its media partners by March 4. Should a new deal with another conglom happen, WWE’s shows wouldn’t move to a new network until October.


Yet even as WWE makes the rounds of media congloms, industry insiders say they believe there is no way that NBCUniversal will loosen its grip on WWE. “Monday Night Raw” is a huge contributor to USA’s bottom line and weekly ratings stats; without “Raw” on its schedule, USA Network would drop from first place to as low as No. 4 among basic entertainment networks, costing the company premium advertising dollars. Syfy would also lose a sizable audience without “SmackDown,” which has raised viewership by 35% for the network. “Divas” is a hit for E! but has perhaps has benefitted WWE more, given that it’s helped the company attract more women, which currently make up around 35% of its audience.

The third hour of “Raw” is up 44% vs. programming that aired in the timeslot last year. “Saturday Morning Slam” is up 34% for the CW, “Main Event” is up 25% for ION and “Divas” has boosted ratings 166% for E!

WWE’s pay-per-views, including annual juggernauts “WrestleMania” and “SummerSlam” won’t be part of the negotiations, since those will air on the company’s new subscription-based WWE Network, which will also include original series and access to the company’s VOD library. Launch plans for the channel, which WWE sees as its own NFL Network, have yet to be revealed. However, WWE maintains that it could break even on the venture if it can sign up 800,000 to 1 million subscribers willing to pay around $10 to $14 per month.

Digital next-day rights to shows would also become part of any new licensing deal with a TV network, costing Hulu Plus the programming it currently airs. In the past, TV Everywhere wasn’t a hot topic for networks when WWE inked its current network deals.

“Partners who pay licensing fees are now expecting to get the TV Everywhere distribution rights,” Barrios says.

As it tries to land a better deal, WWE is ready to flex some of its marketing muscle, eager to show off how it’s been able to attract more high-profile advertisers to sponsor its PPVs and tie-in with its wrestlers, known as Superstars. Those now include General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Disney, Doritos, DreamWorks, Paramount, Kmart, Subway, Taco Bell, Colgate, Frito-Lay, Schick and Mattel — attractive to any network, since the channels are the entities that sell and earn the ad dollars. WWE controls PPV sponsorships, digital ad sales and talent appearances.

Other revenue streams also must be taken into consideration. WWE’s social media teams also connect with millions of fans daily, while its magazine, websites, toy lines, YouTube channel (for which it produces 10 to 12 hours of original programming a year) and videogames are popular — and ratings rise for shows that feature WWE’s talent roster, including John Cena (see above), as guest stars.

“WWE is a proven ratings juggernaut, making USA Network No. 1 for the past eight years and delivering more average viewers than every sports property, with the exception of the NFL,” said WWE chairman and CEO Vince McMahon in a statement to Variety. “Given the increasing demand for live, DVR-proof content, we believe the market will value our programming significantly above where we’ve been in the past.”

Adds Wilson of the upcoming negotiations: “This is new territory we’re in. All of the things we’ve done over the last five years have helped raise the profile of our brand and there’s recognition from the marketplace of what we deliver. Now it’s up to the marketplace to tell us if we’re worth it.”

- Variety
Vince went the smart route, they basically could actually get a place like Fox Sports to say we can make ourselves a juggernaut.

Disney is also interesting because that's ESPN they are talking with. I mean maybe not the main station but espn 2 would be big too and it would force them to be taken seriously at least by talking heads who are affiliated with the station
 
Last edited:

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
A partnership with Disney is very lucrative, WWE just launched their 2nd attempt at comics in 5 years, and having Disney/Marvel could seriously help that endeavour out as well.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Yeah Disney/Marvel/ESPN/ABC is pretty big. I mean getting all their coverage on espn 2 and maybe a couple specials on ABC would be huge. Plus as you said some animation would be easier as would some Disney movie appearances and what not.

Fox has the most to gain. They really do as Raw, SD, and the other 3 shows could get FX and FS1 huge viewership and money as that's a long lost of new sponsors they've gained
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
A weekly live sd is a good negotiation point. It would require a new day, but Thursday isn't bad if you don't mind facing the nba on TNT.


Also take it Superstars and NXT are Network properties because they weren't mentioned
 
Last edited:

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
NXT is Hulu in the states and so is Superstars.

as for SMS they were the highest rated thing on Vortex and the CFO of wwe pointed out that if they were renewed, they would have gotten a license increase, so they weren't picked up.
 

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
Digital next-day rights to shows would also become part of any new licensing deal with a TV network, costing Hulu Plus the programming it currently airs. In the past, TV Everywhere wasn’t a hot topic for networks when WWE inked its current network deals.

Sounds like NXT & Superstars would be part of that deal. Its weird because in Canada NXT actually airs on a network.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Here when SD moved to SyFy, NXT was taken off. The only network to air two wwe shows are USA (Raw and AM. Raw) and Universal HD (Raw and ECW years ago, now Raw and SD in a 10 hour block).

Universla HD is what Vince tried to buy while Dana tried to buy G4
 

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
We have a network that airs Raw, SD!, NXT, Vintage, and original programming like Experience(a recap show of the weeks events), and Aftermath(a round table discussion with former ref. Jimmy Corderas, that was where Renne "Young" Paquette got her start). The only show that airs here, that is not on that network is Total Divas, which may be effected by this.

My only issue currently is the Scooby Doo movie, if a deal with Disney/Marvel is made, it may effect the deal with WB/DC.
 

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Think Fox FX is probably the more likely deal and as a fan I'd like it better look at the kind of programming on FX we could get storylines that have a little more maturity. Not saying over the top.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
FX is also entering the last years of Son of Anarchy so yeah I see the way FX, FXX, and Fox Sports 1 could all benefit from the properties being spread among them. Raw to FX, FS1 gets SD, FXX gets the minor shows?
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
As we mentioned earlier, the WWE will undertake a monumental TV-rights negotiations next month. For the first time ever, the WWE will take their entire slate of TV programs to the open marketplace with many large television networks throwing hundreds-of-million dollar bids at them for their rights. The shows – USA’s “Raw”, Syfy’s “Friday Night SmackDown,” “Main Event” on ION Television, the CW’s “Saturday Morning Slam” and reality show “Total Divas” on E! — will all move under one parent company. According to various sources, ESPN and Fox Sports are extremely likely to end up as NBC-Universals main competition in securing WWE’s television rights.

Early last week, I received word from a well-placed ESPN source that Vince McMahon and team of high-ranking WWE officials have already met with ESPN leaders in regards to moving their programming to their family of networks. Why ESPN? Well, there’s three reasons. First, Vince McMahon has always wanted the WWE to have a program on ESPN and has long-wished for the day that WWE programming are covered alongside of other sports. Second, ESPN has made is known that they wish to have a combat sport that can rival UFC on their main competitors station, Fox Sports 1. Furthermore, they fear seeing the WWE end up on the Fox networks in any capacity. And, finally, the source stated that the WWE is seeking “trusted, experienced” television hosts to assist with the WWE Network. Under an ESPN partnership, the WWE would be able to again utilize Jonathan Coachman and Todd Grisham to give the network a few well-known faces and credibility.


The same source mentioned that 90′s WWE host Todd Pettengill is also being considered for a role with the WWE Network.


That chief competition is, of course, Fox Sports 1. A WWE source familiar with the meetings that have taken place informed me last week that Fox is considered the “dark horse” in negotiations. With Fox Sports 1′s launch being pushed hard by the company, their ratings have fallen extremely flat. Currently, UFC programming is keeping FS1 afloat. Fox is “salivating” at the thought of carrying both WWE and UFC programming on their networks and feels that this tandem would quickly grow their sports offerings exponentially. Under this deal, RAW and Smackdown would be seen on Fox Sports 1 or FX and quickly help to lead those networks to being among the weekly top three most-watched cable networks. Fox also sees Fox Sports 2 as the perfect home for “Main Event” and even a weekly NXT program. Fox also feels as if the WWE’s umbrella of shows meshes well with their main demographic.

EXCLUSIVE: ESPN & Fox Sports Considered NBC’s Main Competition For WWE Programming in 2014

Theme of 14 seems to be Vince is going to eat with these new tv deals and the network, raking in more than ever before like Forbes declared months ago.

Espn, fox, or current setup? I'm leaning toward fox if Raw gets FX. But boy espn could rule Mondays if they went Raw on espn 2 simultaneously during football season and then shift over to the main station during the off season
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
ESPN would be a pretty huge deal for WWE if they went with them and I think that is the obvious choice to go with. Does help that they already have Coach and Todd over at ESPN (Coach gets his wrestling past brought up from time to time on Mike and mike) If they can't do that then I think they might as well stand pat.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
@PHX don't you think they would explore fox? I mean they have all the sister channels. FX surely would get raw because it has similar coverage to USA, but the other sisters can each gain from adding wwe tv. I think fox would pay. The movie world fox is part of might also be a thought process.

I will say that it isn't as easy to bend them over like they did in 05. Wwe wanted heat and velocity on g4 but had no negotiation power. They wanted NXT on TV but it got kicked when sd got added. They wanted to shop superstars after wgn expired as it was reported, but they could only add it to a universal cable station. To me it seems like nbc will have to house all their shows now especially since SD and Total Divas have been such big hits.

Even though it goes overlooked, Main Event averages more weekly viewers than Impact, and I don't know about where you stay, but I don't even get a hd feed of ion or the cw

I agree if the money is close to the same across the board you take espn and don't look back long as you work out the preemptions

32d7fd8c1890fd8939eb851ae1fcd0f7.jpg
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,394
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
Todd Pettengill?!?!?! No fucking way. He was the absolute worst, made Adamle look like Gorilla Monsoon.

Would be a definite game changer if they went to a sports network, I think USA would pay out the anus for Raw, Smackdown, and every other WWE show. Because those rasslin fans are the reason they get eyeballs to their networks in a time when TV viewership is at an all time low due to straming, the over abundance of specialty channels, and cables seemingly infinite number of networks.