Punk vs. Cena and Orton vs. Christian last summer says otherwise, brother. It's a good time for money feuds, but domestic fans are going to be hesitant to pay to see Goldust who is rarely active.
Punk vs. Cena and Orton vs. Christian last summer says otherwise, brother. It's a good time for money feuds, but domestic fans are going to be hesitant to pay to see Goldust who is rarely active.
He might be semi-active, but he's not Undertaker. He's not even Triple H. He's not even Mick Foley for that matter. I'll go as far as to say that, hell, he's not even Jerry Lawler! It'd be a good fight for the more educated fans, and the feud could be pretty much golden, but it'd be difficult to get mainstream fans who don't see Goldust as being that legitimite to buy into the hype on a grand stage like WrestleMania.
Yeah because he's only wrestled for 20 years and has one of the most recognizable gimmicks in history
To wrestling fans, not mainstream fans, which is the point EC was making.
Yeah, you'd be real good running a company that's trying to make money.Fuck mainstream fans. If they don't want to accept all aspects of wrestling, let them go watch something else
Yeah, you'd be real good running a company that's trying to make money.
I want to entertain people that actually know about what they're watching
I want to entertain people that actually know about what they're watching
I want to entertain people that actually know about what they're watching