With the current way the WWE is building the Taker/HHH fued, it is leading me to belive that HBK is being set up for one last match. With him as the speacial referee, and tension being high between all 3 men involved, whoever comes out on the losing side can legitamatly lay claim to a fued with Shawn Michaels.
If Taker loses, he can claim the match wasn't "pure". If HHH loses, he can turn it into a situation where his own best friend of 17 years cost him the match, with the stoyline evolving of a "hidden" adjenda by HBK to prove HHH wasnt as good as himself.
So leads to two scenarios:
A) Taker VS HBK at WM 29, where it comes full circle and HBK ends the streak through his "one last match" on the biggest stage.
B) HHH VS HBK at WM 29 to settle who is the "greatest", again in his "one last match" on the grandest stage, with the stipulation again that it will be a retirement match for HHH if he loses.
Either scenario, HBK wins, and all three men are retired.
What do you guys think?
If Taker loses, he can claim the match wasn't "pure". If HHH loses, he can turn it into a situation where his own best friend of 17 years cost him the match, with the stoyline evolving of a "hidden" adjenda by HBK to prove HHH wasnt as good as himself.
So leads to two scenarios:
A) Taker VS HBK at WM 29, where it comes full circle and HBK ends the streak through his "one last match" on the biggest stage.
B) HHH VS HBK at WM 29 to settle who is the "greatest", again in his "one last match" on the grandest stage, with the stipulation again that it will be a retirement match for HHH if he loses.
Either scenario, HBK wins, and all three men are retired.
What do you guys think?