WWE Money In The Bank 2012 Preview & Live Discussion Thread

[Smart Marx]

The burden of proof lies upon the one making the positive assertion or claim if you will.


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk

Why don't you prove that edge/foley gets talked about more

I just went back and read the last few pages - now was ViperRKO suggesting Money in the Bank didn't make Edge a certified main eventer?

MiTB defined Edge and made him the "Ultimate Opportunist". Every superstar to win since has tried to imitate Edge's success by cashing in the briefcase on an unsuspecting champion - like Edge made history doing; he set the precedent when he became the first briefcase holder and made that first controversial cashing in on a weakened John Cena who just defended his title after a brutal Elimination Chamber. That Edge wasn't made a superstar that night? He hasn't won a remarkable eleven world titles since then? Or become a Hall of Famer with the WWE? I guess not; must have been mistaken. My bad.

 

[Starlight]

HHH vs Cena? I don't even remember that match and I watch all the WWE pay-per views. Did it really happen? haha

 

[Fuji Vice]

HHH vs Cena? I don't even remember that match and I watch all the WWE pay-per views. Did it really happen? haha

Apparently it did, because everyone's talking about it.

 

[Smart Marx]

Apparently it did, because everyone's talking about it.

Who is this everyone in which you speak of?


Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk

 

[Sabretooth]

You can't prove which one gets talked about more. It's just on wwe tv

 

[Death Dealer]

Last thing I'll say about it. If we're going just off of forums then it's clearly Edge/Foley. Because aside from you, I've seen no one talk about HHH/Cena.

 

[Fuji Vice]

You can't prove which one gets talked about more. It's just on wwe tv

Yet you made a statement that claimed more people talk about HHH/Cena.

I guess I must be missing something here but doesn't your above post basically negate your previous comments?

 

[Sabretooth]

Yet you made a statement that claimed more people talk about HHH/Cena.

I guess I must be missing something here but doesn't your above post basically negate your previous comments?

No it's just that on wwe tv, Cena vs triple gets talked about more.

 

[Death Dealer]

Easy Fuji he doesn't know what negate means and I've literally seen them mention Edge/Foley more on WWE TV as well.

 

[Fuji Vice]

No it's just that on wwe tv, Cena vs triple gets talked about more.

I'm still not getting it, because I haven't heard that match mentioned on tv in quite some time.

Anyway, its no big deal, you're wrong, it would have been easier just to admit it four pages ago.

 

[NovaRoad]

No it's just that on wwe tv, Cena vs triple gets talked about more.

Really? That's your cue for thinking that Cena/HHH was the more memorable match? You don't think WWE TV is a little biased in that assessment considering the match included its top babyface and its Executive VP? Let's not forget that this is the same WWE that thinks Wrestlemania 28 was the greatest event of all time.

Among wrestling fans in general, it's clear that the more memorable match isn't the same as what WWE TV thinks it is.

 

[Sabretooth]

I'm still not getting it, because I haven't heard that match mentioned on tv in quite some time.

Anyway, its no big deal, you're wrong, it would have been easier just to admit it four pages ago.

And I haven't heard edge/foley mentioned in quite some time

 

[Fuji Vice]

And I haven't heard edge/foley mentioned in quite some time

Once again though, that doesn't PROVE your previous statement. Turning things around is not you winning an argument, its you proving that you don't even know what one is. Unless you can actually give me some kind of factual proof that "more people" talk about HHH/Cena (and in that case you've also negated your argument again because WWE TV does not represent the so-called people you mentioned originally) then I will continue to sit here and say that you are WRONG. It's not up to me to prove my statement, its up to you to prove yours.

 

[NovaRoad]

Damnit! Mensa just called me to let me know they revoked my membership! Thanks Viper, you bastard.

 

[Sabretooth]

Once again though, that doesn't PROVE your previous statement. Turning things around is not you winning an argument, its you proving that you don't even know what one is. Unless you can actually give me some kind of factual proof that "more people" talk about HHH/Cena (and in that case you've also negated your argument again because WWE TV does not represent the so-called people you mentioned originally) then I will continue to sit here and say that you are WRONG. It's not up to me to prove my statement, its up to you to prove yours.

You can't factually prove something like this. It's just what I hear