WWE Future Endeavors 2012

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,151
Reaction score
8,962
Points
113
Age
25
THE RATING ISN'T THE PROBLEM, PEOPLE!!!! Holy shit.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2


Yeah because John Cena saying "fudging" wasn't the stupidest thing ever.
 

The Viper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
6,432
Reaction score
128
Points
63
Age
32
Yeah because John Cena saying "fudging" wasn't the stupidest thing ever.

Even with a TV-14 rating, he wasn't gonna say "fucking" or anything heavy like that.

But with how bad the writing can be a lot of the times, you're worried about Cena saying "fudging"?
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
777
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Age
37
The problem has never been the rating. The switch from TV-14 to TV-PG happened in when...middle of 2008? It's not as if things were amazing in 2007 or years before. Based on several interviews with former writers, most of the time the WWE wasn't even writing TV-PG, but TV-G, so they knew they were following the guidelines.

It all comes down to the writing though. The entire period from when Vince Jr. took over in 1983 until the Attitude Era began was all basically TV-PG. Yet, the WWE made some things works (Including a gigantic boom). Things like Cena writing "Poopy" on JBL's limo wasn't a product of the TV-PG rating. It was a decision made by the creative. Things won't magically improve with a rating change.

Do you know what TV-14 really means? It merely means the ability to show middle fingers, have a few tame cuss words, show your women in degrading positions, ramp up the sex and increase the violence just a tad. How does any of that improve the quality of the show? I mean hell, at the height of the Attitude Era, channels like TSN in Canada and Skybox in the UK would edit the hell out of the shows to remove the TV-14 elements. So it's not as if you can't have a popular worldwide company without TV-14.
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,151
Reaction score
8,962
Points
113
Age
25
Bring blood back, throw in a few curse words here and there.

Even that will help the show a little
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
777
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Age
37
How is including a few more damn's supposed to help or hurt the show?
 

Gentleman Jake

You Must Have Me Confused with Someone Far Less Awesome
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
69,694
Reaction score
30,628
Points
138
Age
48
Location
Wherever Your Mom Is
Favorite Wrestler
scotthall
Favorite Wrestler
kevinnash
Favorite Wrestler
hhh
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
You like hearing cursing....the Attitude Era is gone....and wouldn't work today...I am so sick of hearing about bring back blood and swearing....really who gives a poop
 

Sabretooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
74,151
Reaction score
8,962
Points
113
Age
25
You like hearing cursing....the Attitude Era is gone....and wouldn't work today...I am so sick of hearing about bring back blood and swearing....really who gives a poop

Did I say bring back the Attitude Era? That's impossible because of the different wrestlers. But in 2011, when Punk was cursing at Johnny Ace that was good tv. When Cena was cursing at the Rock that was good tv. When Cena was bleeding at the hands of Lesnar that was good tv.
 

Wangman Page

Cowboy Shit
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
20,416
Reaction score
3,424
Points
138
Age
47
Location
Dancing
Favorite Wrestler
hulkhogan
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
boots2asses
Did I say bring back the Attitude Era? That's impossible because of the different wrestlers. But in 2011, when Punk was cursing at Johnny Ace that was good tv. When Cena was cursing at the Rock that was good tv. When Cena was bleeding at the hands of Lesnar that was good tv.

so you want them all in the ring with knives, spears, and Lions. You basically want a Gladiator fight.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
777
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Age
37
The one thing that would be appealing is blood. It's not something that needs to happen every week, but look at how many dangerous gimmick matches the WWE has. Elimination Chamber, TLC, Money in the Bank, Steel Cage, Tables, Chairs and a wide variety of other kinds. To have such dangerous matches without either guy losing a drop of blood is unrealistic. The whole reason you do blood in those matches is to put the match over as being so much more dangerous. Think of some of the most iconic images in wrestling history. Austin trapped in the Sharpshooter at Wrestlemania. Mr. McMahon lifting his head above the ring apron in Seattle. Any of the classic images of Ric Flair's platinum locks now crimson red. The blood helped tell a story that couldn't have been told without it.

Blood can really help a great moment become an iconic one. And that's just talking about classic non-gimmick matches. A cage match without blood is like watching a porno without a money shot. Something's missing.