WS Mafia II: THE REBUILD - Game Thread

[CraigPelton]

My reason was good. You claimed I slipped because you misunderstood a post and when I pointed out the misunderstanding you refused to acknowledge or engage with the explanation and just kept repeating SLIPPY over and over while actually trying to wagon me over it. Your reason for voting me was infinitely more bullshit than the reasons people are voting you.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

who is the sixth

Tweet?

 

[Bobby Barrows]

unvote
vote Juice

I just hate it whenever someone tries to shade inactives when there's plenty of activity right in front of them. This game has been running for like 5 hours and you wanna look at inactives?

Yeah, Tweet is voting Juice.

 

[CakeWalker]

How is me thinking there might be more than one scum team - worthy of a vote?
I keep getting told - this is how we play - this is how we play - this is the meta - this is the style

So if I saying anything - VOTE JUICE
that no how we play

VOTE JUICE

fuck this.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

How is me thinking there might be more than one scum team - worthy of a vote?
I keep getting told - this is how we play - this is how we play - this is the meta - this is the style

So if I saying anything - VOTE JUICE
that no how we play

VOTE JUICE

fuck this.

Because it doesn't feel like it's being done in good faith.

Your anger is noted which is why I said I don't know if scum Juice does this. But as CP pointed out, you're liable to go off as any alignment.

 

[CakeWalker]

If the excuse is - I got off.
Then I'm done.

 

[CakeWalker]

*I go off

 

[CraigPelton]

Nobody said you got off

 

[Bobby Barrows]

That's not much of an excuse but it doesn't help your case if you do it as both alignments and thus doesn't help give you town reads.

 

[CakeWalker]

My reason was good. You claimed I slipped because you misunderstood a post and when I pointed out the misunderstanding you refused to acknowledge or engage with the explanation and just kept repeating SLIPPY over and over while actually trying to wagon me over it. Your reason for voting me was infinitely more bullshit than the reasons people are voting you.

So you think I misunderstood your post? But I was also bullshitting.

So its can't be both

 

[Bobby Barrows]

So why do you think Jeff and Tweet are voting you, Juice?

 

[RDK]

My reason was good. You claimed I slipped because you misunderstood a post and when I pointed out the misunderstanding you refused to acknowledge or engage with the explanation and just kept repeating SLIPPY over and over while actually trying to wagon me over it. Your reason for voting me was infinitely more bullshit than the reasons people are voting you.

Hello my great friend, nice to interact with you for the first time this game!

I would ask you to consider the fact Juice OFTEN as both alignments doubles down on MINOR and often non-alignment indicative items (such as slips) and claims them as 100% certain reasons why someone may be non-town and why she is the GOAT for being right about them.

 

[CraigPelton]

My reason was good. You claimed I slipped because you misunderstood a post and when I pointed out the misunderstanding you refused to acknowledge or engage with the explanation and just kept repeating SLIPPY over and over while actually trying to wagon me over it. Your reason for voting me was infinitely more bullshit than the reasons people are voting you.

She still is just never going to address this lmao. So much easier to play the victim!

 

[CakeWalker]

None of my arguments - have ever had anything to do with 'the game of mafia'
Its not my fault - this place is filled with players that like to use toxic method to win games.

 

[CraigPelton]

Hello my great friend, nice to interact with you for the first time this game!

I would ask you to consider the fact Juice OFTEN as both alignments doubles down on MINOR and often non-alignment indicative items (such as slips) and claims them as 100% certain reasons why someone may be non-town and why she is the GOAT for being right about them.

I know that my friend but in this case I believe I have delineated the malignancy adequately