- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 23,057
- Reaction score
- 72
- Points
- 48
- Location
- Streets Ahead
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
If you haven't heard UFC have supposedly signed a massive deal, $90 million a year, with Fox which will start once UFC's deal with SpikeTV expires next year. UFC along with TNA were SpikeTV's two biggest brands so with UFC gone this could mean two things.
Positive: TNA is now the most important brand for SpikeTV and that puts them in a fantastic position. SpikeTV can put more money and energy into TNA. They may be looking to fill the gap left by UFC by giving TNA more programming time in the form of a second show.
Negative: There were rumours a few months back that with UFC leaving SpikeTV were going to completely rebrand the network. Rather than focussing on males it will try to draw in all viewers. This would mean that TNA would be on the back burner and not the focus if a rebranding happens.
Do you think this will turn into a positive or negative for TNA?
Positive: TNA is now the most important brand for SpikeTV and that puts them in a fantastic position. SpikeTV can put more money and energy into TNA. They may be looking to fill the gap left by UFC by giving TNA more programming time in the form of a second show.
Negative: There were rumours a few months back that with UFC leaving SpikeTV were going to completely rebrand the network. Rather than focussing on males it will try to draw in all viewers. This would mean that TNA would be on the back burner and not the focus if a rebranding happens.
Do you think this will turn into a positive or negative for TNA?