I'm sure since they have a lot of money that means the courts will find them right but I find this defense of trying to force arbitration bc that was the terms the NDA laid out for disputes completely useless. Because the whole point is Vince stopped paying because he said she broke the terms. For him to make that distinction, HE should have went to arbitration and explained why he would no longer be paying what was owed.
None of it is shocking, he's always thought people should play by rules that he's above but it seems very cut and dry to me. Vince was the first one that took issue with the NDA agreement, if he's arguing she can't go public bc she has a dispute then likewise he cannot just decide to not pay bc of his dispute