Undertaker Wants Wrestlemania Match

[Stopspot]

Yeah but I imagine the majority of casuals don't sit and deliberate over which man is the most decorated, and I imagine 95% see Bryan as a comedy guy who is carried by Kane. Even if he were to snap on Kane and beat the living hell out of him, whenever he gets angry the crowd's first instinct will be to chant 'yes' or 'goatface' or whatever.

But that is the thing with Ambrose, he's basically starting on a blank canvas like Ryback was a couple of months ago. Now obviously he doesn't have anywhere near the presence of Ryback, but he just has to go over a few top guys to be at that stage. For the record, I think for WWE to draw Brock/Taker is the way to go, but if they are thinking long term and putting over a guy, then Ambrose has to be the pick. I don't think anybody has any real doubts that he is ready, he's proved throughout his time in FCW that he can perform in the ring, (and let's be honest here, Taker could carry me to a 4 star match) and of course mic work he's gonna have no problem with lol.

The fued basically books itself, it would be so fun seeing a guy completely no sell all of Taker's shit and try to play head games with him, as I say, Brock/Taker is the way I'd go, but Ambrose/Taker would undoubtedly be epic.

I want to see Taker vs Ambrose. I just don't want to see it in his first calender year on the main roster. I feel like he should end his first mania raising a title in the air. Just to truly solidify him on the roster. I'd very much like him working a program for the IC title with Kofi if Kofi still holds it. It can also be pretty easily written if you pick the right starting point. Kofi is going on about being more and more aggressive in ring. Have Dean question that and make it a feud that spans say Rumble to mania on the side of Shield's other program. Have it become more and more violent as it goes on and at Mania they face of in a No DQ or similar match, ending with Ambrose doing what he does best next to talking, brawl and then stand, IC title raised high over a broken Kofi.

Somehow, going for a title first feels more right to me. I guess it is the less risk factor.

 

[Rysenberg]

I want to see Taker vs Ambrose. I just don't want to see it in his first calender year on the main roster. I feel like he should end his first mania raising a title in the air. Just to truly solidify him on the roster. I'd very much like him working a program for the IC title with Kofi if Kofi still holds it. It can also be pretty easily written if you pick the right starting point. Kofi is going on about being more and more aggressive in ring. Have Dean question that and make it a feud that spans say Rumble to mania on the side of Shield's other program. Have it become more and more violent as it goes on and at Mania they face of in a No DQ or similar match, ending with Ambrose doing what he does best next to talking, brawl and then stand, IC title raised high over a broken Kofi.

I think if Ambrose/Taker ever had any realistic chance of happening (which it doesn't) then it would have to be this year. Taker's gonna be busy with Cena @ 30 and contrary to reports, I can't see him doing anything after that. I just think with Ambrose that you have a chance to create a mega heel within a few months and it would be such a shame to lose such an amazing fued. I guess the more conventional route is what we can expect, although a fued with Kofi would suck. I really don't understand the love for the guy, the only thing he supposedly has going for him is ring work and even that is average as hell IMO.

This is obviously why I don't work for a multi-million dollar corporation, but I'd love to see them take a risk with this one.

 

[Stopspot]

I think if Ambrose/Taker ever had any realistic chance of happening (which it doesn't) then it would have to be this year. Taker's gonna be busy with Cena @ 30 and contrary to reports, I can't see him doing anything after that. I just think with Ambrose that you have a chance to create a mega heel within a few months and it would be such a shame to lose such an amazing fued. I guess the more conventional route is what we can expect, although a fued with Kofi would suck. I really don't understand the love for the guy, the only thing he supposedly has going for him is ring work and even that is average as hell IMO.

This is obviously why I don't work for a multi-million dollar corporation, but I'd love to see them take a risk with this one.

Had it been any other time than Mania and Taker was able to work I would have been all for Ambrose going at him. Mania needs to be something special though. I'd also like to see Ambrose vs Triple H somewhere down the line. H is loved almost on a level similar to Taker so that would also work wonders for him.

 

[Rysenberg]

Had it been any other time than Mania and Taker was able to work I would have been all for Ambrose going at him. Mania needs to be something special though. I'd also like to see Ambrose vs Triple H somewhere down the line. H is loved almost on a level similar to Taker so that would also work wonders for him.

Definitely. The promos would be phenomenal and the match would just be perfection. It does make a lot more sense given that it can made for any time or place really.

 

[Stopspot]

Definitely. The promos would be phenomenal and the match would just be perfection. It does make a lot more sense given that it can made for any time or place really.

That's how I reason as well. As long as Hunter is around and willing to work, the chance to make Ambrose an instant mega heel is always there. I personally prefer natural progression up the card though. Like Dolph or Daniel

 

[Leo C]

HHH/Ambrose would be great to see. But would Triple H be willing to job? The last matches we saw were vs Taker at WM or vs Brock. The last match he had with a young talent (vs Punk) didn't end up so well as far as putting the new guy over.

 

[Danielson]

Give him legend killer Orton, If someone else has said this, then you're awesome.

 

[juvie123]

good for him

 

[JeebaK]

Keep dreaming. Taker vs Abmrose or any other newcomer for the matter IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AT WRESTLEMANIA, atleast not this year atleast.
Why?
Simple.
Its not gonna sell.

Wrestlemania is meant for already established stars to reach greater heights, not a stage to establish and breed new talents.

I get the feeling that Taker would face Brock, and the feud will start at Survivor series.

__________

Keep dreaming. Taker vs Abmrose or any other newcomer for the matter IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AT WRESTLEMANIA, atleast not this year atleast.
Why?
Simple.
Its not gonna sell.

Wrestlemania is meant for already established stars to reach greater heights, not a stage to establish and breed new talents.

I get the feeling that Taker would face Brock, and the feud will start at Survivor series.

__________

Keep dreaming. Taker vs Abmrose or any other newcomer for the matter IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AT WRESTLEMANIA, atleast not this year atleast.
Why?
Simple.
Its not gonna sell.

Wrestlemania is meant for already established stars to reach greater heights, not a stage to establish and breed new talents.

I get the feeling that Taker would face Brock, and the feud will start at Survivor series.

__________

Keep dreaming. Taker vs Abmrose or any other newcomer for the matter IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AT WRESTLEMANIA, atleast not this year atleast.
Why?
Simple.
Its not gonna sell.

Wrestlemania is meant for already established stars to reach greater heights, not a stage to establish and breed new talents.

I get the feeling that Taker would face Brock, and the feud will start at Survivor series.

 

[Lockard 23]

You really underestimate the quality of Bryan..... He looked somewhat credible against Sheamus, Show and Henry despite never getting a straight win because of how good he is, build him correctly and of course the casuals will buy into.... They did with Shawn because of his build so why not Bryan?

Michaels is taller and I think faster paced and more athletic in the ring than Bryan, which I feel makes him more credible against big(ger) guys. He was also already an established legend by the time WM25 and 26 happened. Not that I think Taker/Bryan would be bad, but for a Wrestlemania and the immortal streak being on the line, Bryan isn't a special enough star to really be considered a credible threat. To be fair, Punk normally wouldn't be either, and it's only because he's been world champion for over a year and counting that he might end up facing Taker at WM, title or no title.

Speaking of Ambrose (since others have brought him up), I think if the Shield angle goes well and they push him right as a singles star (he is almost the total package, so it seems WWE would want to do their best to make him into a star), he could be a credible option in the future for breaking Taker's streak. I don't see it ever happening though, as Brock or Punk will face him next year and Cena at WM30, and I suspect he might retire after that. I think Triple H sounds like a very credible opponent to put over Ambrose next year, while Rollins and Reigns can win the tag titles from Bryan and Kane. Ambrose can then win a singles title the next month or something. That's the best way I see The Shield working, Ambrose being a singles champ and Rollins and Reigns being the tag champs.

 

[Jose Tortilla]

Keep dreaming. Taker vs Abmrose or any other newcomer for the matter IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AT WRESTLEMANIA, atleast not this year atleast.
Why?
Simple.
Its not gonna sell.

SS already has been..ity:

 

[JeebaK]

SS already has been..ity:

what? i dont get it?

 

[Stopspot]

what? i dont get it?

Survivor Series, which you in a previous post claimed should be the start of a taker vs Brock feud. Has already been. Taker was not booked for the event and neither was Brock.

 

[JeebaK]

Survivor Series, which you in a previous post claimed should be the start of a taker vs Brock feud. Has already been. Taker was not booked for the event and neither was Brock.

Sorry i meant Royal Rumble, my bad, i will edit it.